Hmmm?
Type 10 has the least issues out of the 3 mentioned.
Though I of course will agree on Leclerc and have no opinion on Italy.
I know Ariete C2 project was a thing but cancelled, and that’s the extent of my Ariete knowledge outside of all Ariete C1s using TURMS-D optics which are worse than the TURMS-T optics seen on T-72AV.
1 Like
From I know the Arietes cheek armor is supposed to be more like either a Abrams or a Leopard 2. Some people had documents showing that the models in game were wrong but I don’t have them at the moment.
2 Likes
A text determines the values exact to around 500mm+ equipped with WARKIT, and by sources used in the study able to stop the WT 3BM60(which is weaker than IRL 3BM60, like other rounds), or at the very least 3BM42M/3BM46. UFP is around 400-500mm.
It was supposedly accurately modelled in dev server.
2 Likes
The C2 ariete is not only underway, but also going on better than planned efficiencies per the claims of Italian MOD. The AMV currently in the game is the first prototype out of the three, however there are rumors that the third prototype is cancelled while the PT2 will feature all the upgrades the C2 ariete will use such as WARKIT and ATTILA-D commander sight and new engine/transmissions in the PT1. Alternate theories claims that the third prototype will use trophy systems but the vehicle is still nowhere to be seen.
Model AGM-114Ls
Add the M-Shorad which has SAMs / AGM-114Ls
ez
That’d be nice, but again, doesn’t fix the problem with the KVT and Click Bait, or the player skill issue.
Other nations will have top tier premiums soon.
Player skill will always favor minor nations where less players are. That’s why when I see every nation but the US / Russia / Germany with a positive win rate, I don’t view that as a negative. That’s balanced. Noobs play the big three, their win rates are never going to be strong.
I love how the winrates are super low for USA and Russia, but when you ask players why for USA, they’ll say American players suck, but about Russia, they’ll say Russian vehicles suck. Skill issue for thee and not for me.
Remember how for the past three years any complaint against BVM was dismissed with “skill issue, just aim for weakspots, russian mains are just better” and now when those same russian mains have to aim for weakspots, its a problem for them?
2 Likes
I was thinking the exact same thing…
When R-27ERs were two guaranteed kills it was OK, but now the 9M is too OP, apparently.
2 Likes
To be fair the situation was tad bit different with this
AFAIK mig29 9.13 and 9.12A were meant to have R-27Rs only BUT with ability to have R-73.
Since R-73 was deemed too OP at time, they got replaced with R-60s and to compensate ERs were added.
And if you ever played with R-60s you know how much these missiles suck.
The gap between the R-60M and 9L is a lot less than the gap between the 27ER and any other radar missile though. It was still a mistake in my opinion.
No Russian Player Skill is worse than the US player skill on average. I want to make it clear. Its just that they get more “Player Friendly” vehicles, or vehicles that perform better when played in the “Rush B” lifestyle, which makes them seem better. While US is more sit back then people are willing to admit.
I mean sure, back in may of last year, I would trade ERs for 73s on 9.12A in a heartbeat.
I hate R-60s so much.
lol Just lol
This is why USA planes are all under-BR’d and Soviet planes are all correctly BR’d right?
Or how about USA having FAR better CAS… [which is correct].
Maybe even the fact that USA has a larger lineup of M829A2 shooters, which M829A1 is 3BM60 equivalent itself.
The fact F-15A is still 12.3 instead of 12.7 and P51H5NA being 6.3 instead of 6.7 is all the evidence we need, and I do my best to play them when I have the time but boy oh boy my playing of them isn’t impactful enough to stats.
I can only hope. It REALLY screws over the US. It’s not even like it was just one vehicle- we got two Top Tier premiums in the span of a year, both pack prems, both at BRs that actually matter (The XM-1 at 9.3, thanks to their not being a lot of significant vehicles there, sat at a BR that "didn’t matter for the US)
I just don’t understand why it was only added to the US. If every other nation, or some of the other “big ones” got it, It would make more sense. But they didn’t. So.
lol Just lol.
Skill Issue from the RUssians. Y’all got capable planes.
Or how about USSR having FAR better SPAAG…[which is correct].
Maybe even the fact that USSR gets more 3BM42 firing tanks earlier, while US is stuck with M735 and M774 for way too long, where M833 is 3BM42 equivalent itself.
Ok, you think American planes are all under BRd (they aren’t, but ok). A lot of people think the same thing about Russian tanks. The fact 2S38 being 10.0 instead of 10.7 and the BMP-2M being 10.0 instead of 10.3 is all the evidence we need.
Unless you want more. In which case the T-55AM-1, T-55A, KV-1E, 2S25M, Obj 906, BMP-1, IT-1, Su-25, Su-25K (and Ill give you the A-10s, but only if Gaijin fixes their damage model). I’m sure there is more too- I’m just listing a few for now.
oh oh how the Soviets are burning that now they are not the only ones who have a cheat. Examples: unkillable infantry fighting vehicle, cheat armor, unpenetrable reactive armor, AZ in the game cannot be slowed down in reality, this is a mechanism that means it can break, etc.
Sir, I’m 1- American. 2- Play all 10 tech trees.
Time for me to defend America while your post embellishes the Soviets.
T-55AM-1 is inferior to all 9.0s in the game and is thus correct in being 8.7. Its APFSDS round is very 8.3 - 8.7, and the composite add-ons is what makes it 8.7. Normal T-55A is hilariously mid.
KV-1E has equivalents at 4.0 such as M4A2 for USA & Germany, as well as KV-1B for Germany.
BMP-2M’s equivalent of M3A3 is also at 10.0.
2S38 is just a Strf 9040C with slightly more pen, so at most 0.3 higher than Strf 9040C.
Object 906’s equivalents are all 7.7.
BMP-1 is lol… Marder 1’s its equivalent.