Maybe the vehicle with double the penetration values of every other IFV at its rank shouldn’t be at its rank considering it also has access to proxy shells and IRST tracking.
1 Like
Wrong CV + ammo
a lot of 9.0-9.7 vehicles are lightly armored so being penned by a 10.0 IFV isn’t that surprising
But as we can see in the pic, while both can pen, the 2S38 has a bit more area it can go trough in the turret + it’s a bigger round which means it will probably cause more damage
There’s also the fact that it can deal with angles a bit better thanks to the pen
Here’s a the MBT70 in 9.3 which shows off where that difference shows up a bit more on the hull
1 Like
Overall a 2S38 will always beat the Strf4090C in terms of ranged combat as it won’t lose the same amount of pen, have the option of hiding behind cover and only exposing the remote turret which will be hella hard to hit and pen allows them to be a bit worse with aiming
Edit:
I mean hey, if you’re ever staring down the side plate of a maus at 1km for some very strange reason, the winner is clear
Blowout panels?
Doesn’t make too much difference when 3BM60 will still front plate M1A2s, meanwhile the only thing that can front plate a BVM is DM53 or Object 292 without hitting the miniscult drivers port
F-15 is strong, yes but why should the P-51 move up lmao?
You forget that M829A2 out-pens L/44 DM53.
P-51 should move up cause it’s the best piston prop in the game.
I was referring to L/55 DM53
I suppose M829A2 can UFP T-80 if youre above it and/or lucky
P-51 isn’t that good lmao
it’s very simple, there are 3 largest nations in the game, played by the most players, and yet one of them is much better than these two and cries the most…
The point of view depends on the seating position, Leopards are good to drive, they are difficult to kill in one shot, they load quickly, they raise and lower the gun well, they reverse, and they don’t have 10 fuel tanks inside…
Abrams, for example, doesn’t have a piece of armor compared to Leopards on the top tier, you get hit in the hull or a weakpoint under the turret, you know what’s going on, you either die immediately or you don’t have half the crew, along with the turret ring and the gun breech…
As for this wonderful Russian bias whose winrate is the color of its own flag…
3 crew members, which means it will always end with a oneshot, the fuel tanks, which are incomparably larger than other tanks, explode more often than the ammorack, which is also a disadvantage, and of course, the dynamics of these tanks, with the exception of the T80 series, are simply poor.
thank God that newer tanks have 1100 hp… [t72b3 t90m…] and also slow turret rotation and slow, turtle-like operation of the gun up and down, except for the T80bvm and t90m
According to my German colleagues, everything is fine, I’m waiting for the next crying post at 2S38 xD
2 Likes
The P-51H is an incredibly good plane. It should be 6.7, because it does not have many weaknesses. It also gets incredibly good MM in air RB with very few uptiers in my experience.
If you do bad in it, that’s a skill issue.
It’s only weakness is its top speed.
22+ deg per second sustained turn rate.
25+ meter per second climb.
9 minutes of methanol injection.
And 6 potent 50 cals.
If there us no ammo there that shot passes through now with mininal dng. Best shot on lfp was left sude to take out driver, gunner, and commander in one shot but even that hasn’t been trustworthy.
My man straight up denying between red skies and air superiority the game was anything but point and click adventure game for russians against anything that wasnt sweden
A very nice photo.
I believe this is sadly much closer to the truth.
maybe you remember the times when the USA received the Abrams, and the USSR and Germany only received the T-64a and Leopard 1, respectively?
1 Like
Update 1.77 “Advancing Storm”
USA
Magach 3 (Gift)
M1 Abrams
Germany
Leopard 2K
USSR
T-64B (1984)
I fail to see where they added the Leopard 1.
Cause both prototypes of the XM-1(General Motors and Chrysler) are not Abrams it was a prototype and therefore was not designated as such. It was however used a lot back then.
-
first 105mm abrams released on march 2018 during update advancing storm, alongside leopard 2K and challenger 1 mk. 2. After one patch, in june 2018, Leopard 2A4 and type 90 were introduced, alongside BV mod for 64. And on september 2018, during update valkyries, russians got 80B.
-
BVM got introduced on june 2021 during update red skies, 2A7/122B+ got introduced on december 23 during update air superiority. Thats some 2.5 years.
Sure, lets acknowledge abrams on release was broken without proper competition - for three months.
But even then what I said its true - there was no tank in game for 2.5 years that wasnt swedish that could measure up to BVMs protection.
And even now BVM still has edge over its competition in certain areas such as those totally realistically performing relikt bags™.
People love to cope by saying BVM has worse penetration of only 560mm of flat pen but that still allowed it to UFP 90% of competitors centre mass while no round, even currently, can do the same to BVM.
Another popular cope is that BVM armor has weakspots, which, yeah sherlock, great detective work. Same people presenting BVMs armor as paper thin due to presence of weakspots present 2A7/Strv122 armor as impenetrable despite presence of weakspots.
1 Like
top tanks penetrate each other relatively easily. the problem is that there is no damage for some models
then what kind of anomaly was there in 2020?
And even with the presence of BVM, the win rate of no country fell to 30%, maximum to 45%. and then it stabilized to 50%+. I could be wrong, because this is not such important knowledge to keep in mind
China that 1 time
Both Italy and Sweden are currently on 74%, not sure what the heck the italiens are doing but it’s clearly working, besides US,USSR and GB the rest are on 62-65%
Just playing the game normally, after all, gods can be killed but not defeated