Lol same idea
“This Thai vehicle shouldn’t go to Japan because China and NATO don’t like eachother.”
Thailand has always appealed to both Western and Eastern powers. Hence why they have the F-16, F-5 A-7£, Gripen,etc. while also having the VT-4, VN-1C, Type 85/84, DTI-1, etc. So why would you add the Western vehicles and not the Eastern ones?
6 Likes
Therefore, it is not difficult to see that the subtree mechanism is no longer suitable for the current and future gaming environment. Subtrees established based on so-called relationships that contradict international norms will inevitably lead to numerous meaningless disputes.
Gaijin should make a subtree folder. When a department reaches the top level, it can develop any subtree vehicles, which can be brought into any main department.
Limit the number of vehicles in the subtree. (for example, each queue can only carry 2-3 subtree vehicles)
Hello everyone.
Thank you for your feedback so far.
We are currently reviewing your feedback regarding our consideration for Singaporean vehicles. We aim to provide a detailed update in the next Community Update news, coming soon.
55 Likes
Thank you for responding, hope this whole mess hasn’t ruined or affected your honeymoon
2 Likes
At least this is something, I hope to see the Community notes for this one.
2 Likes
Hopefully the feedback is listened to this time. We had the same situation last October when Singapore to China was leaked but that seemed to just not have any effect.
13 Likes
Because that is where the Thai TT is.
And its going to Thailand. As a Thai Vehicle. Thailand is just a sub-nation of the Japanese TT. The vehicle itself is not Japanese.
There are a lot of unresolved historical issues in this game. Do you really think this is the biggest one?
I am confused as to how this is relevant.
19 Likes
South Korea has a better chance being in the US tree as a Sub tree than the Japanese one.
1 Like
Or gaijin could do a Benelux and add a United Korea into China : P
(Runaway)
2 Likes
It better be good news
Welcome back smin
Hopefully this whole debacle can start a conversation about how sub trees should be used in-game vs how they are currently being used in-game.
(Cough Britain having two sub trees with nations it has little-to-no positive relations with, more commonwealth MBTs supposedly on the horizon, all whilst missing 95% of its domestic light tanks and 80% of Vickers’ tank catalogue cough)
4 Likes
They still have to fit Ukraine in the tech tree. if we fit China this isn’t a USSR tech tree, this is an Communism tech tree.
Will that come before the Q&A with BVVD or After?
you are joking about the no positive relations right? uk and australia have very good relations
UK subs are India and South Africa
ah okay, how is india a sub over australia? there are about 4 or 5 australian planes compared to india’s two non tt aircraft
Ask gaijin
1 Like