If you could, how would you re-balance CAS in Ground Battles?

[DerGrafVonZahl]

@GoneToTheAether

Then they picked the wrong game and need to stop falling into the sunk cost fallacy.

Why? Because you say so?

@GoneToTheAether

Whole other games, particularly GHPC, were made specifically to answer calls for a soft-realism tank sim without player-controlled CAS. Multiplayer for that one is under development.

And the game isn’t as popular because the people actually want a shooter(!!!) without CAS. If they wanted a sim, GSB wouldn’t look like it does today.

You are misreading these people. You are projecting and interpreting things onto them that isn’t there.

They are shooter players, not simmers.

@GoneToTheAether

To an extent, yes. It’s equivalent to two people fighting in a dusty street, things escalate, one of them picks up a piece of furniture and throws it at the other. It misses, and hits me, permanently disfiguring me. Why would I NOT be angry at whoever threw the chair, whether they intended to hit me or not?

Because it was never a fight. You made it one.

People had needs and you invalidated them (“your issues aren’t real”). Of course their reaction is combative. If you would be cooperative this wouldn’t have happened.

All aggression comes from you.

[Pangolin_Fan]

They did events. Doesn’t take much research to find them

[ULQ_LOVER]

So please provide link for it

[CoffeeBean100]

I am well aware of them, they do not fit what you were saying and appear to be parroting a feeling.

[ULQ_LOVER]

@GoneToTheAether

Adding TO now is equivalent to a frustrated parent having to miss work to take their kid home from school early and go to the doctor for a respiratory illness. The frustrated parent practically screams for an antibiotic without waiting for or caring whether the infection is even something an antibiotic would work on. The frustrated parent is completely irrational and beyond reasoning, and simply wants a “quick fix RIGHT NOW” without care for the consequences.

It is not.

Adding TO is like giving someone a ham sandwich without cheese because he asked for it as he prefers it that way.

Your portray of TO mode is only because You are still angry that gaijin have done something no one asked for.

[Foehn_Actual]

US gest 15% SP off by default(just kidding)

[CoffeeBean100]

If only players in 2024 had the IQ to use a correct thread, but instead keep spamming the wrong topics about it:

Revised poll on CAS in Ground Battles, would you play a tank only mode?

I took a lot of feedback, both positive and negative, from the original thread on this subject and used it to create a new poll on aircraft in ground battles. For this reason, there are now MULTIPLE individual polls instead of attempting to cluster all the questions into one poll. Original thread here: Would you play a tank only mode? How do you feel about CAS in ground battles? [(POLL)] - #186 by ehj78 Please keep in mind that this is an informal poll that I will use to inform my own suggesti…

Irony is all those making new topics get theirs closed then NEVER go to the proper topic to get together to ask for this new mode. I wonder why Gaijin do not seem to listen to this minority! Hmmmm

[Harry_DuBois]

I’d make it only have 2 slots at a time, like in Enlisted

[CoffeeBean100]

If both sides get CAS first then both sides will be unable to use the best anti-CAS; Fighters.

[Maldrokk]

you can’t think of any reason a2g costs high amounts in a ground battle?

[Morvran]

Typo. I meant A2A aircraft

[Maldrokk]

Fair A2A with actual a2a loadouts should definitely be cheaper than strike if they’re to be left in ground, things with ground strike capability def need to be raised in price

[Morvran]

Some things yes, some things no. It depends on what and what BR. Personally I think unguided weapons above 10.0 should actually be made a little cheaper, or remain the same and guided weapons made a little more expensive.

For example. There is no incentive to use unguided bombs on the tornado Gr1 because they are the same SP cost as GBUs and a TPod.

[MilksDeMorango]

just make em need to kill more then 1 player or scout 2 enemies , ppl are pretty much just spawning the little rat tank , scouting 2-3 targets and bringing a full loaded ass plane with 10 tons of bombs to trow into you at less then 2 minutes of a match …

[Pangolin_Fan]

You’re the one coping.
I would 100% fine with allowing people to take SPAA into ARB, aka treating everyone the same.

[PointyPuffin]

I guess, Gaijin just “balanced” CAS, lol

Has anyone noticed that the updated bombs, rockets, and missiles have less explosive power than before

As shown in the screenshot, in the protection analysis, the 152kg TNT equivalent exploded on the side of the vehicle with additional armor, and not all of the vehicle crew died. This is very absurd. After the previous version of the HEAT damage problem was solved, some bugs continued to exist, hoping to be taken seriously [20240625004952] [20240625005055] [20240625005218] [20240625005238]

[ULQ_LOVER]

The worst possible approach, but this is what we get for not having a proper mode for tankers

[Jean_Ahmed]

where can I download this game mode?
hehe…

[PointyPuffin]

This seems to affect everything that relies on explosive mass to kill, including howitzers.

[Pangolin_Fan]

I wish we could. Killing Pantsir S1s would be so fun on release day.