well makes sense, F-15E is heavier F-15 which is already optimized for much, much higher speed. at low speeds, sure the harrier beats it, but im guessing past like mach 0.8 the F-15 wins
But are you ok with 10.3 if its flight model gets another buff?
Kinda you have to be careful of combat endurance. For the F-15 to have the advantage it needs afterburner lol.
I think that you focussed too much on decompressing 11.0-13.0, and not enough on 7.0-10.0.
The F-86s should start at 8.7, not 8.3, and no supersonic plane with flares should be facing flareless subsonic planes in my opinion.
Yeah ik I play the higher BR’s so I know what to do with them, but not the lower which is why im asking for help. I moved the F-86’s up do I need to move them up more? I dont want to kill them.
I think that those BRs (with a bit of decompressoin) would work nicely right now. The Av-8s are currently 10.0 planes at 9.7, so they desperately need to go up to make 8.7-9.3 more bearable.
Also there is only 1 Sabre at 8.3 and it is the earliest one, I think that should still be fine. It wont see any 7.0s so that’ll be good but at 9.3 it would still be playable.
nah, from around mach 0.78-0.82 the F-15E has acceleration advantage even without AB. it goes from 960 kph to 1100 kph 3x faster than harrier at 1000m, with afterburner
Ohhh acceleration yes absolutely
well thats the difference between 80s light VTOL strike jet and heavy multirole interdictor lol. both have their place in a military
Yes they are two different animals and beasts in their own right
I might be a British main but the F-15 is still one of the coolest looking jets ever.
With decompression, the first one should go to 8.7, because right now it is undertiered relative to every other 8.0-9.0 plane.
From there, the barrier for subsonic to supersonic aircraft should be moved from 9.3 to 10.0, with the best subsonic missile-less planes being 0.3 below the worst supersonic planes (Q-5 Early, Su-7, And the french F-100). After that, the better supersonics should appear at 10.3, with the F-104, F-100, and possibly the Mig-19S.
Okay, i’ll look into that thanks for the advice.
yeah, if i had to take off and land on a light carrier or LHD/LHA i would take a harrier every time lol.
its a very intersting looking jet, with the giant turbofan and VTOL nozzles. but it comes together fairly well
The Harrier is the only jet in the world bar f35 that can land on deck in extreme weather conditions
erm akchualy V-22 can take off and land from one, and it uses turboprop which is type of jet /s
Fair play but a V22 can’t carry amraam
Would be interesting if it could lol
I can see it all ready 24 amraam loadout V22
Laser turrets
The whole deal
imagine they find a way to hook up the GAU-17 turret (actual thing it has, optional on belly of aircraft) on it to the defence suite and it just CIWS any MANPADS or AAM lol