lmao that’ll be op
Also crazy how you guys got to helicopters with arh missiles from a British jet in the american tech tree.
Safe from all threats
Except its own reliability……
2 Likes
if they did link turret to defensive stuff, it would probably shoot itself down as its own largest threat. dont get me wrong i love osprey but its service record is atrocious.
1 Like
Makes the F-104 look like a Volvo
2 Likes
ok it isnt that bad, come on
2 Likes
I’m going to stop editing it tonight guys i’ll get back at it tomorrow or monday!
1 Like
I need you update, and add another aircraft (edit in the future)
- F2H-4 with AIM-9B (8.0) rank V
- F11F-1 (e) (none AN/APG-30A radar and short nose) rank VI
- F8U-1E (F-8B) in folder with F8U-2, BR 10.0
- A-7B on group before A-7D & A-7E
- F-80B-1 between F-80A-5 and F-80C-10
- F-8J between F-8E and F-4J
- F-16CG (Block 40) between F-16A and F-16C (Block 50) or before F-16C
- F-4E (1986) before F-15A
- F4D-1 (e) (Pratt & Whitney J57-P-2 engine) before F3H-2
- F-15E (early) before F-15E, but BR 13.0
- AV-8B Day Attack (DA) before AV-8B+
- A-7E (late) BR same A-7K, on A-7 group (A-7D & A-7E)
1 Like
Isn’t this a old event jet?
Event vehicle F4D-1 better engine (Pratt & Whitney J57-P-8B) only
Ahh ok
Sorry to breaking it down for you, but you won against 2 clueless players in planes that run circles around yours if they had a functioning brain.
Lmao sorry to break it down for you but that’s just not the case. Not anymore at least the Harriers where very good dogfighting aircraft IRL and they got buffed a little I currently have bug reports in as they still underperform. A Harrier with 30% fuel can sustain over 16 degrees a second in turn rate.
I can do this consistently.
1 Like
Hey not to be that guy but he was helping me out becuase I hadn’t seen how the harriers have played yet. I’m just trying to help make a better TT with BR and new jets.
1 Like
Thats nice and all, but the Harrier is worse than those planes.
F-8E:
F-5C:
F-4E:
@LiquidGod750-live thats also okay, but as an advise, do not get in to a dogfight if possible in a Harrier, in a nose to nose fight its okay and you should win, but try to play it as an ambush plane, dont get in to furbals or you wont come out alive
2 Likes
Take into account combat fuel time and those planes have 2 mins of fuel in that loadout if that at all lol.
The Harrier will have like 10 or so.
The Harrier should sustain more with less throttle the bug reports are all out for that.
None of those planes will out climb the harrier below 20,000 feet
Going into the vertical can do wonders.
Statshark is not only not correct sometimes but it doesn’t include flaps or the fact that the harrier can nozzle down and improve its turn.
At 400 knots with VIFF irl the harrier can improve its ITR to 19 degrees a second which you will find to be even on par with the MiG-21
1 Like
Event vehicle fitted Pratt & Whitney J57-P-8 engine
But the F4D-1 early production J57-P-6 engine slightly worse J57-P-8
1 Like
Ahh ok that makes sense i’ll be sure to add it
When you update add another aircraft (after F14D, F7U-3M and F-90A) ?
1 Like
Also, F-14D with AIM-54C+ (with 25G dual plane etc. , ECM resistance ) is a 14,7 if we compare with vehicles with AIM-120A/B.
APG-71 was a beast of a radar and if they model the missile correctly , there is no reason not to be 1 BR higher than 14B.
The difference in the radar is too big, especially if you think it has TV and IR sensor (which they are still in use…IR sensor maximum range is 182 km -let’s say 60-70km combat range) , link-16 etc. as well.
F/A-18C would be above it if at the very least gets AIM-120C7.
Well, i’m talking if they make things relative of how they were RL, for example if the AIM-54C+ is just an AIM-54C with different name , no , it will be 14.0 or even 13,7 same as 14B.
1 Like