I propose lowering the combat rating of the Abrams

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
502

that doesn’t seem right to me, none of the upper plate can be penned unless you’re angled down. So I’m not sure why a round with 560mm of pen is slightly green across the top.

I’ll have to check on my computer when I play next. The only place you can shoot a 2a7v or Strv 122b is the LFP or the, mantlet or if you’re decent and can squeeze it into the turret ring.

Or at least those are the shots I attempt. I have never penned any of that light green area unless the tank is angled down from me like it’s going down a hill.

Just seems incorrect, but maybe I’m so set in my ways at shooting at these things I didn’t even know another way was possible. I will never even aim at that area of the tank because it never pens.

503

if youre shooting turret roofs youre bad at the game

504

Well that’s just incorrect I clip t series roof all the time.

1 Like
505

I said hull roof, not turret roof.
You could also call it UFP I guess if that unpenetrable section is a beak.

Area around the drivers port is pennable, but all that on the right side will ricochet.

506

This area should work though.
image

507

upper plate hits tend to skim into the breech for me if I messed up a shot. it usually goes clean through tho

image
image1483×634 99.5 KB

508

I thought that was non viable on 2a7 for some reason.

I aim there on the rest, just not the 2a7’s/strvs. But for me it’s the smallest point anyways. I’m always LFP if I see the tank, or mantlet to take out barrel/breech then push them and finish off.

509

Yes you can do that close to the driver’s port. Other parts are just a no go.

510

image
image1613×613 104 KB

goes through the other side and ignores the spall liner killing the loader just as well

511

That’s not how it works in game, we can test it out in a custom if you don’t believe me.
Even 2A4 will bounce a DM53 there.

512

I would need to give gajin sikrit document then because they dont accept my report on it having the ability to install the engine and the transmission

513

120s was intended to have the same power pack and transmission combo as the Abrams if it had gone into production the prototype that was made still used a m60 power pack

514

Actually small correction the transmission of the 120S and abrums are different
The 120S utilized the x-1100-5 while the abrums have the x-1100-3B and they are completely different
One made for gas and one made for diesel
But yes everyone would assume so even alot of online and available information about it said so
Also it also entered production privately(hence classified info) of around 30 units to an unknown buyers

515

No my bad everything I’ve seen said they where the same

516

they would have been the same if the abrams use diesel engine yes
also the merkava mk.3 has the same engine and as the 120S intended to be btw

517

The Abrams is absolutely fine where it is. Before the click bait was released the M1 severely suffered in 10.3, mainly because of KVT players.

I have a much better time with the abrams at 10.7 than I did at 10.3!

518

1: I agree, the BR should be lowered.
2: What type of Abrams is this?
3: Is it just me, or is the reload of the 292 WAY too fast considering the amount of propellant needed to get such a heavy projectile to be so fast?

519

It’s autoloaded, so it makes it faster than manually loading a 152mm shell.

2 Likes
520

cat-no

cat-annoyed

2 Likes
521

copium