And is gatekeep by the designated transmission which has a max speed of 61.6 km/h and reverse speed deemed to be around ~20 km/h
Theres a reason why its 10.3 cant denied the gun handling
But turret armor isnt good it get penned by 3bm42 at up to 1.2km
Another issue is it having incorrect turret neck model
You mean in reality? I really can’t discern if you mean reality or game based on the previous comment.
If reality, this is a bad take because the Abrams is not worse than a lot of its NATO counterparts.
Cant do prot analysis rn but im pretty sure it get penned (tested it myself which is the reason why i make the statement in the first place)
Bad mobility makes it free xp it cant go hull down because when it reach a hull down spot cas already spawn
Cant retreat when pinned cant run away and cant go to the point fast
M60-AMBT(ik its not tech tree vehicle but the ambt is related to the 120S and it has the engine that is designated to the 120S-the 1200hp)
It just doesnt have the x-1100-5 transmission
The abrams main issue is that players think that armour matters that high up in BR, everyone has LRF so can hit the weak spots from any range. Abrams has a quite easy weakspot as its just “shoot the middle to win”, its not quite as bad as challenger in that sense but does make it struggle
I would rather have a fast vehicle than a sluggish one like the 120S and im sure people will agree that 120S is shit aside from the gun handling and only the turret face armor
i honestly dont care if its 10.7 because i can flank can hull down can run away can get to position fast
Now? i cannot hull down quickly, i cant run away, i cant defense myself agains light vehicle that has apfsds like the bmp or whatever, i cant get to point fast because a lone t80u already got my ass because they are faster