? :D
radiation isn’t even over 3.5 rads!
what i called you a spy? lol
oh, one of them is in the D.o.D, the others are all vets from the Navy, Army, Air Force. and the others i don’t talk about as they are active. oh and no one willingly talks to the C.I.A. Ask yourself would you really talk to people who wear Hawaiian shirts to even known theatre of war for the past 60+ years, some people say they glow in the dark…
So you agree a 5.3 sec load time is an ace crew load time at best.
Alright gaijin, you heard the man!
Next you’ll tell me you know the president personally
I agree that an expert crew can reload in 5.3 seconds, and would you look at that, that’s exactly what the game shows.
an ace crew which could address the aspects that could have been done faster would reflect another .3 reduction at least, but Abrams doesn’t need to go lower than 5. It’s fine where it’s at.
Look at that, it’s already shown in game lol
Not what I said. Ace crew should be 5.5 since ace crews are every where it’s far too common than rare. Thus a expert crew should be 6.0 and low and behold neither would be 6.75 (the average load time)
I’m not gonna go down the rabbit hole with you lol.
Because I proved a point?
you have an opinion, there’s a difference.
Entirely based on video data, and irl accounts.
Irl accounts and video? Like the one I posted showing an experienced crew. Or the US government study document, that said the average load time was 5.3 seconds which you disregarded in another thread where an actual tanker proved you wrong?
Proof like that?
That’s what proof looks like. That’s what proving a point looks like. You’ve given an opinion, and boy howdy it’s a fine one at that, be proud of it, but it’s not proved by anything.
That’s why I won’t go down the rabbit hole with you any further(good on ya for getting me this far lol).
Consider this my last response regarding your opinion
Lmao “that’s what evidence looks like”
Meanwhile you: ignore all the videos I’ve posted before, and clearly ignore very possible situations like tests being lied on.
But hey, the world is your chief, we’re all just living clearly.
Main character, oh main character, whatever shall we do??
Would you like more examples? Unless using your immense bias, (or lying to yourself), you can disprove these?
Nor did I cherry pick. Took the first results.
Being lenient, giving until the breech drops even, almost all are +7 sec load times, fastest was roughly 5.839 secs.
So in game, it’s actually biased. I didn’t even take the averages as I know it’s not going to be good.
lmfao these people aren’t loading for combat,
Don’t forget that T-80B and T-80U didn’t have thermals irl
T-80b had an upgrade package, and the T80U does… where did you read it didn’t??
I’m glad you agree it’s a USA cope issue.
They are. And even @RavenGuardMarine liked it. You @sartt have too much propaganda in your life. But call up the prez for me, tell him I said hi
T-80U thermal sight Agava-2.
US mains try not to cry - impossible
propaganda? lmfao
Gaijin Double Standards
you mean that experimental thermal sight? that was only on a single tank? oh and BTW the T-80UK /T80UM was the one with the thermal sight, not the T-80U. If we follow this same logic those abrams with the D.U Hulled at the army school " should be baseline in the tech tree.
T-80 should not have thermals :: War Thunder General Discussions
If the T80B and T80U get thermals, why doesn’t the T80UM-2? : r/Warthunder