I think that the lower frontal part should be thicker, some sources indicate up to 500mm and the upper frontal part should be thicker
Post those sources then
1 Like
It was a long time ago, on one forum they studied Abrams armor.
1 Like
a youtube video is not a source
i would like english too
1 Like
This is literally just the steel beasts armour for the abrams its fake
1 Like
The fact is that on all modern Abrams armor data is classified and we cannot know how much is there; in the game, unknown data can be used for balance and customizing the armor for each tank.
they sure do complain about gun depression alot.
1 Like
lmfao
the Standard M1A2 Turret LOWEST simulated protection was 650mm. standard SEP ARMOR BTW^^^L0L
IF THE M1A2 SEP ARMOR WAS INCREASED TO HAVE 35% MORE ARMOR, and then sep v2 recieved and stronger D.U armor, and the SEP V3 GOT EVEN STRONGER D.U ARMOR THAN THE PREVIOUSY THREE, WHAT DO YOU THINK IT IS? L O L
3 Likes
Whats the source on this, posting an image and screaming isnt a source
1 Like
Oh boy, we love cherry picking glass cannons to try and prove a moot point.
Here’s the exact same cherry picking of your degree…
Move '292 to 20.0!!1!
Here’s a legitimate equal to the M1… And it can’t do a thing to to it.
It has more than enough armor for what it can fight, and the IPM1 / M1A1 do it even better while being 11.3 instead of 10.7.
Then again… You have 17 matches in the M1. Your opinion of it is effectively nonexistent.
T-72B isn’t capable of 3BM60, Leopard 2A4 has more than enough armor and maneuverability to make up for its DM23.
It isn’t? It’s a pretty decent tank with a LOT of great capabilities. You get DM33 at 10.7, good mobility, and spall liners that make it nearly invulnerable when hull-down.
Composite*, not reload.
you can hear words/ letters screaming at you? crazy.
there are people that have sources including the tech mods and other sources
gaijin knows this and has all the information, they just refuse to implements it.
Well if gaijin has it why don’t you post the sources shouldn’t be too hard well unless you know the sources are unreliable and theres a reason why gaijin isnt using them
3 Likes
bruh its already been done lol theres a entire thread about this that stona closed because we kept destroying the devs claims
Well if you supposedly destroyed their claims then post the sources
4 Likes
The devs decide your armour mate, not bug reports.
All MBTs at the top ranks have armour that is approximated by the devs based on widely available public documents and estimates, this can be seen in the case of the 2a7 using frontal hull data from the early 2a5 shown off in the swedish tank trials 30 years before it’s introduction, essentially missing 20+ years of armour development because they dont feel like it needs to be better
5 Likes
its clear you dont know what bug reports are do you?
which german players also proved was in correct and gaijin essentially ignored this as well. The challengers Leo 2a5s and m1a2 hulls are completely immune to 3BM 42 and gaijin knows this. All 3 of the turrets are completely immune to every single russian ATGM in this game.
I’m a little confused, did you write to me?