I propose lowering the combat rating of the Abrams

I said hull roof, not turret roof.
You could also call it UFP I guess if that unpenetrable section is a beak.

Area around the drivers port is pennable, but all that on the right side will ricochet.

This area should work though.
image

upper plate hits tend to skim into the breech for me if I messed up a shot. it usually goes clean through tho

I thought that was non viable on 2a7 for some reason.

I aim there on the rest, just not the 2a7’s/strvs. But for me it’s the smallest point anyways. I’m always LFP if I see the tank, or mantlet to take out barrel/breech then push them and finish off.

Yes you can do that close to the driver’s port. Other parts are just a no go.


goes through the other side and ignores the spall liner killing the loader just as well

That’s not how it works in game, we can test it out in a custom if you don’t believe me.
Even 2A4 will bounce a DM53 there.

I would need to give gajin sikrit document then because they dont accept my report on it having the ability to install the engine and the transmission

120s was intended to have the same power pack and transmission combo as the Abrams if it had gone into production the prototype that was made still used a m60 power pack

Actually small correction the transmission of the 120S and abrums are different
The 120S utilized the x-1100-5 while the abrums have the x-1100-3B and they are completely different
One made for gas and one made for diesel
But yes everyone would assume so even alot of online and available information about it said so
Also it also entered production privately(hence classified info) of around 30 units to an unknown buyers

No my bad everything I’ve seen said they where the same

they would have been the same if the abrams use diesel engine yes
also the merkava mk.3 has the same engine and as the 120S intended to be btw

The Abrams is absolutely fine where it is. Before the click bait was released the M1 severely suffered in 10.3, mainly because of KVT players.

I have a much better time with the abrams at 10.7 than I did at 10.3!

1: I agree, the BR should be lowered.
2: What type of Abrams is this?
3: Is it just me, or is the reload of the 292 WAY too fast considering the amount of propellant needed to get such a heavy projectile to be so fast?

It’s autoloaded, so it makes it faster than manually loading a 152mm shell.

2 Likes

cat-no

cat-annoyed

2 Likes

copium

omg guys SU-152 needs to be moved down immediately pls guys…

2 Likes

Just back here to say my opinion again, I don’t think it needs to go down, just give it M833. M774 is pretty lackluster at 10.7.

1 Like

Don’t think that is enough, M900 should do it and move it down to 10.0.

1 Like