Your way of balancing 120S is to give it a 1200HP engine, which would push it up to 10.7.
Why would it be when the mobility is piss poor for its BR
Would u want a slow ass tank with no armor or something that has no armor but decent mobility?
Every tank within the 9.3-11.3 can one shot it no problem so whats the reason to not give it faster mobility in compensate to the 0 armor
With new engine it would have 21.3 HP/t which would actually be more or same than some other MBTs at 10.3 and 10.7.
Because it has good turret armor, great reload speed, gun handling, M829A1 and great thermals ?
And is gatekeep by the designated transmission which has a max speed of 61.6 km/h and reverse speed deemed to be around ~20 km/h
Theres a reason why its 10.3 cant denied the gun handling
But turret armor isnt good it get penned by 3bm42 at up to 1.2km
Another issue is it having incorrect turret neck model
You mean in reality? I really can’t discern if you mean reality or game based on the previous comment.
If reality, this is a bad take because the Abrams is not worse than a lot of its NATO counterparts.
1 Like
Okay maybe M833 but that’s about it
go right side
Cant do prot analysis rn but im pretty sure it get penned (tested it myself which is the reason why i make the statement in the first place)
Bad mobility makes it free xp it cant go hull down because when it reach a hull down spot cas already spawn
Cant retreat when pinned cant run away and cant go to the point fast
Are we talking about the Maus or the Abrams?
The slow as a maus half abrams
Gunner’s side is a mixed bag, it’ll mostly eat 3BM42 even from 500m away.
Having decent mobility and all of the above isn’t possible for an 10.3 MBT.
M60-AMBT(ik its not tech tree vehicle but the ambt is related to the 120S and it has the engine that is designated to the 120S-the 1200hp)
It just doesnt have the x-1100-5 transmission
out of all vehicles to use as reference the Obj292? come one man.
LMFAO
1 Like
Now that im at 10.7 i think the abrams is pretty meh it just lacking a few things then its fine tbh
AMBT is at 10.0 only because it’s not played as much.
120S also has much better turret armor, slightly better shell and much better reload time.
The abrams main issue is that players think that armour matters that high up in BR, everyone has LRF so can hit the weak spots from any range. Abrams has a quite easy weakspot as its just “shoot the middle to win”, its not quite as bad as challenger in that sense but does make it struggle
1 Like
I would rather have a fast vehicle than a sluggish one like the 120S and im sure people will agree that 120S is shit aside from the gun handling and only the turret face armor
i honestly dont care if its 10.7 because i can flank can hull down can run away can get to position fast
Now? i cannot hull down quickly, i cant run away, i cant defense myself agains light vehicle that has apfsds like the bmp or whatever, i cant get to point fast because a lone t80u already got my ass because they are faster
Armor DEFINITELY matters that high up in BR. The 2a7’s aren’t so dominant because of their round and reload rate.