The 4-3-0 is just a once-in-a-lifetime event for you base on your record it seems? I thought the so OP vehicle you claimed it is you would be on the top of the food chain in 5 out of 10 matches lol but trading one vehicle for one kill is the best you can do on the vehicle of world strongest bias? My M1 Abrams has the exact same number, why you conveniently ignore it, at least bring an argument it could be used to support either position bro
you must really be garbage is you can’t get more than 1 kill a match in a 292
huh? you are the one who struggles to get more than one kill before death lmao do you even know you are too garbage to understand Abrams can perform as well as Object 292 in terms of kill/death ratio because one of them already shoot twice in 10 seconds and can reverse 3 times faster? hora11 was right along, do you even numbers bro?
yup you’re proof that people like you are blind. Literally just showed you a video of me going 4- 3- 0 in a 292 and you keep saying i can’t get more than 1 kill. Go troll somewhere else.
Lol your 292 (a super OP vehicle with vibranium armor and nuke cannon) says you have 1.2kdr, almost the same as every OooBROMS you played, what does that mean? you have 4 kills in this game, then in the next three game you die without kills??? OP vehicle should have more kills than death on average, because they are OP. Do you even mathematic bro? the numbers don’t add up, base on your record they all perform the same. lmao
How do you have 43% WR and sub 1 K/D in a Pantsir ? I heard that thing removes all enemy planes the moment they spawn, as they have absolutely no chance to survive.
Either you’re really bad at the game or that thing is yet another nothingburger.
Meanwhile you’re sub 1 K/D with bad WRs in both 2S38 and TURMS and they come spaded from game one. Your 292 also has all the bias features and the best round in the game stock, but you barely have over 1 K/D with it.
T-80UK also has terrible K/D and WR after 40+ games.
Meanwhile your US vehicles at a similar BR have the same or even better stats, so I guess they aren’t really that inferior to everything else in the game.
I can show you a game of me going 12-1 in a Type 16.
Does that mean I have 12 K/D in it ?
“hey hey hey hey bro when I play RU vehicles I intentionally turn off my brain and hodl W haha you have no idea how many shots I’ve bounced”
~every USA mains ever
he hid his stats
lmao
Here’s my ultimate Jumbo
100% winning rate bro, still UNDEFEATED… while having 4 deaths with no kill LUL
Absolute OP of a vehicle, undefeated. Don’t yall think my Jumbo is OP? haha
I would like to refer to myself again. Yes the Abrams is not to IRL in Game but the T-series is cause well Russia cares more for quantity then quality to they cut every corner so yes it is worse and no need to complain cause if the Abrams was to speck as I said only the leopard could hurt it.
T-series would not be as competitive but the abrams is worse than a lot of it’s NATO counterparts
Cause the Nato counterpart is Leo
I exclude Challenger.
Either way some abrums variant like the M1 120S and the A1(exclude aim) need the balance
Your way of balancing 120S is to give it a 1200HP engine, which would push it up to 10.7.
Why would it be when the mobility is piss poor for its BR
Would u want a slow ass tank with no armor or something that has no armor but decent mobility?
Every tank within the 9.3-11.3 can one shot it no problem so whats the reason to not give it faster mobility in compensate to the 0 armor
With new engine it would have 21.3 HP/t which would actually be more or same than some other MBTs at 10.3 and 10.7.
Because it has good turret armor, great reload speed, gun handling, M829A1 and great thermals ?
And is gatekeep by the designated transmission which has a max speed of 61.6 km/h and reverse speed deemed to be around ~20 km/h
Theres a reason why its 10.3 cant denied the gun handling
But turret armor isnt good it get penned by 3bm42 at up to 1.2km
Another issue is it having incorrect turret neck model
You mean in reality? I really can’t discern if you mean reality or game based on the previous comment.
If reality, this is a bad take because the Abrams is not worse than a lot of its NATO counterparts.
Okay maybe M833 but that’s about it