Oh wow, you edited in a technicality, whoopee, you totally win! You get a cookie. Still doesn’t change the fact that there’s a massive list there that shows AIM 9Ls predate your whole 12.0 spam.
No, you still can’t read. The image shows that the original post ONLY had the first line, then I added EVERYTHING ELSE all at once.
Refer to:
At this point I’m just working to piss you off, evidently it’s working. You’re the one getting all pissy. It’s so funny watching you weirdos getting all autistic over a video game. Just because I could care less about the difference between one MiG and another means I’m bad at the game? I’ll 1v1 you and let’s see how bad I am.
Not on fighters. The only time this rule is broken is with the almost subsonic F-5A models.
Being right doesn’t make me upset
Still means I got you with the whole 12.0 12.0 12.0 thing, since they are below 12.0 12.0 12.0 (read it again)
I’m on right now, we can duke it out if you think I am bad
The CL-13A Mk.5 was literally the fastest jet in the game when it was added. Back then, during the top speed meta at top tier, there was nothing else that could even compete with it. In some cases, you and your teammate could wipe out the entire enemy team and send them back to the hangar within minutes.
Eventually, the Hunter F.1 and MiG-17 were introduced as direct counterparts to the CL-13, but there were still cases where the MiG-17 and CL-13 ended up on the same team. Playing anything from the NATO side other than the F-2 Sabre or the Hunter felt like pure suffering.
Hunter FGA.9/J32B is a similar case.
I would rather see a rotation BR like SBEC rather than a technology gap because it functionally works almost same and more easier to implement.
1 Like
Not how that works. Read:
I see zero correlation between your response here and me saying:
Oh yeah, Sim definitely has a great system as well, especially since then you can decide if you actually want to play that BR. The only argument I can think of is, “some BRs will be dead because people won’t play it” which makes sense, since I can hardly find servers on Sinai or Denmark when it’s 12.0 or 12.3+, but it’s a good system nonetheless.
This is what I was referring to. I assumed you were implying that I was incredibly bad.
Rotation BRs work for sim because the playerbase is tiny and would rather have balanced fun where they get to always pick top br in exchange for basically only being “allowed” to play specific BRs in any given day. The price is worth the payoff for them. For Air RB this would mean for example if I want to play the 109F4 at 4.0 but the current day is 4.0-5.0 then there is no viability in playing the 104F4 that day. The rotation system effectively kills off 50-60% of ALL BRS in game on any given day so that you can play the 40-50% that remain, then they rotate. This isn’t worth it for RB.
If the players playing that BR are occupied by grinders, that is not a problem. At least that is often the case on SA servers during events.
Well, at least you admit you were wrong. You’re a better man than most people here on the forums. Sorry I kept trying to press you.
I wish I could get into SA servers, but all I get are CIS, EU, and NA. Do I need to put my location in Brazil or something for SA, or is it South Africa?
SA means “South Asia”.
To legitimately play to the SA server, you need to be living in East Asia, Southeast Asia, or Oceania.
Well, I live on an island, so Taiwan, Ireland, what’s the difference? We both live right next to our oppressors.
我現在是個騙子, thanks Xbox
Afaik the SA servers are located in Tokyo or Singapore and unless you live in the near nations you will not be able to connect there.
If you live in the area, you should be able to choose your server like this.
Not only Japan, but also Korea, Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, Thai, etc should be able to access the SA server.
In fact, the SBEC lobby on the SA server will be occupied by Chinese players during the event.