How player skill with SPAA effects the CAS problem

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
2489

I suggested that as an alternative to the players on the field so those afflicted may possibly stop being so cut up about it…

You know I mean your plane killstreak you touted earlier on. To even imply otherwise is just bad faith.

No it is… It is hypocritical for you to claim that you ‘test’ this as you commonly use it…

To be making out that we can go to another mode to use air is absolute peak ULQ…

This is just posturing.

There is no tantrum, yet again, you making out that there’s something there isn’t to make out that I’m the problem.

Who said it would get less rewards? It’s only you saying that to cut the suggestion down the mere second it gets put forth…

And what’s the issue with having to earn the SP to get the plane?

All of this is just a circular argument… Absolute peak ULQ…

2490

Oh I don’t need to use it in order to do well. If You don’t trust me You can check my stats.

I commonly use it to showcase the unbalance, that is true.

There is no real reason to add something that is already in another mode as it gives You more rewards there and allows You to do it from the start.

It might be hard for You to understand but I actually care about discussion and I care if what I’m saying is true.

You should really read and stop replying before calming down.

Asking the question again:

2491

Well, I answered it.

2492

It is less rewarding in GRB to do the same as in ARB as:

  1. You actually have to spend time getting into the aircraft, meaning You have less time earning RP/SL than in ARB.

  2. Rewards for air is worse in GRB than in ARB.

Again, why would anyone wanting to hunt down AI/bases would do that in GRB if he could do that from the sart in ARB?

2493

There’s no fact in this, this is all just your speculated opinion.

2494

What is speculated about rewards? @RunaDacino can explain it to You, not to mention many topics on this forum that explained it.

(Good explanation)
image
image
You can see the difference between air and ground modes, talks about score.

Or You want me to draw You a graph showcasing how time spend on something relates to being able to earn more?

2 Likes
2495

What isn’t to speculate about something that isn’t in the game, and as I mentioned elsewhere, that you seem to forget, that what I suggested was already in the game and would stop artillery from being called in…

But I cbfed drawing you anything because you’re just not worth it…

You’re just making circular arguments, and now tagging people to cause more of a dogpile…

Meanwhile I’m waiting for @DESPAIR7991 to reply seeing as they’re lurking with the replying indicator… Come on, don’t choke, you must have some marvel of an opinion to render in amongst this…

This isn’t needed as I mentioned above… It’s not in, it wouldn’t be established and it doesn’t take into account the disabling of the artillery that the original units did, or any other effect that the targets could have.

Still waiting for @DESPAIR7991 to drop a fat post…

2496

Gaijin always gives less rewards for bots. Also bots are either exceptionally stupid (arb btr152 and convoys) or overpowered (nt aa, sim ec aa, arb airfield aa). None of that is fun to play against.

2 Likes
2497

And that’s nothing to do with the worth of it being carried out as an objective. And it’s nothing to do with it being played against, it’s the task and the accomplishment it achieves.

Now a convoy would be a cool one…

2498

Will accomplishing it have effect on battle result? Like ticket reducement

2499

So now we change the topic to artillery? Are we talking about adding new stuff or what was and got removed as it didn’t change much.

2 Likes
2500

Ohh so we don’t have ODL problem. Denying ODL problem is different level.

Then explain why so many people ODL while they have lineups, free buckups and free vehicles.

There’s big difference what BR are you playing, you don’t even understand this simple thing.

Where did i mentioned your stats, why would i care?
And you are right, trolls like you really are out of my league. I wrote facts here:

Not all the times and BRs of course, i didn’t mention it, because everyone understands not all BRs and matches are same.

2501

Found the topic:

2502

That’s just a “solution” used as a “fix” for CAS in GRB.
People would still prefer to defecate onto vehicles controlled by real players than to shoot down some bots going in a straight line.

2 Likes
2503

Wouldn’t be impossible that could be something. Artillery used to be in the maps, and you’d take it out and stop people using it, convoys to the spawns could add to the tickets overall, or give a boost to everyones SP.

They’re all just numbers, and easily put forth, but ULQ here just cuts them off as soon as it’s even looked to be mentioned because he wants to put forth the Tank Only nonsense as if he’s doing others a favor…

It never changed, you are just looking to argue in circles…

Didn’t say we didn’t have an ODL problem, I just said it wasn’t as severe as you were making out.

I actually think that those who are KDR precious are behind a lot of it, but you get those who complain that matches are pre-decided, maps are bad, vehicles and nations they face are OP, and every other excuse you can pluck out of thin air to ‘validate’ anyone having trouble with the game itself is attributing to it.

So you mean to say you plucked 7.0 out of thin air? I don’t believe you… I play 5.0-6.3 because I have no desire to be facing anything serious or modern…

Ahhh, the old troll callout… Pity that… Means you’ve got nothing better to point to.

Exactly, so you can’t say that the ODL issue is every time like you did…

2504

Like there’s ‘one’ thread about ODL with a poll, and like there’s no hope of anyone possibly going after anyone else other than the tanks on the field…

Wallowing in the mire is all these guys do as literally CAS is living rent free…

2505

Not really as it was what was being talked about to which You replied.

2506

Or bots digging into hades kingdom and still perfectly sniping you like in sim ec

1 Like
2507

And every response is you, bounding it about in circles… There is no discussion with you, it’s just round and round the mulberry bush with every reason not to, and every reason why the player or vehicle is inadequate, or that the person who’s responding is the issue with the thread being the victim.

You don’t take on any opinion or suggestion, especially when you don’t think the person making comment is worthy, but in reality I think it’s you being scared that if such a suggestion was tried, you’d be shown to be wrong.

After all, it’s a number of years that you’ve been demanding that mode, and you’ve stoked all those people, wound them all up to be on your beck and call, and you still can’t manage to handle true engagement about any other option, or that something can be used differently, and nonchalantly about being ‘got’…

It’s all part of the game, but this want to flex, is just a forum thing.

If you can’t accept after all this time that SPAA is cheap, and easy to spawn, and able to be used, by anyone and everyone, to protect the team, as well as being part of the team, being able to help repair others, use artillery, and even cap, then you are truly beyond help. and are definitively unengageable.

If we’re to believe the ‘masses’ then we wouldn’t bother spawning SPAA, and we’d just whinge until they change the game to suit our unwillingness to use such a vehicle.

2508

It is not, what I talk about is what was being said in topic.

If You can’t kill an air unit, You are unable to protect the team