Sure, but at the end of the day it removes the tickets as well, and chances are dead enemy player cant capture the cap anyway.
Important yes, but not ultimate.
1 Like
In most cases tickets get drained to zero thanks to points. And it becomes worse and worse over course of battle.
Higher average kd proves that in situation where 2 players fight over objective, player with higher kd will have higher chance to get said objective though.
3 Likes
sure, so lets go for facts
If we go by your all time stats, it takes you one and almost half of a tank to take out one enemy tank.
bit better if we go by mothly, you seem to trade 1 for 1.
single valid point ive seen you make in this entire topic.
Not this case, i can assure you ;)
your reaction speaks thousand words.
sure but killing the enemy protects the point from being captured in the first place. Im not denying ticket drain through point cap isnt important, especially when ticket drain by caps outspeeds any possible ticket drain by kills.
1 Like
You are mistaking it with thunderskill prob
Nope, it was actually statshark because some dumbass checked me at the goading of these tools, and they were mocking me on the train that these guys run, and someone checked their stats on it and stated it.
1 Like
But lets get back to the point of this thread though right?
Who’d have thought that a thread, about SPAA, and using it, would devolve into this ego-inflating nonsense, that it always does…
By the same usual section of ‘‘contributors’’, with the same exact old dragging down nonsense…
You didn’t bring anything at all from the point that you jumped on at, so no, you’re just being an argumentative jester at this stage.
Do you want a third try at explaining why you jumped in with this statement?
Because this statement here is woefully ignorant and shows you haven’t actually looked at the entire thread, thus your single throw in the middle of this end of the thread is just absolutely out of line…
I wonder from which reply it started going downhill:
I would go with thease one as previous were talking about the Game.
But agree, lets go back to the topic. I hope I will have more free time to showcase how SPAAs have really low chance against well used air unit no matter the skill of SPAA player.
1 Like
@Beeschurger But I’ll save poor old joe here the hassle to calm the thread back down again…
Taking my ‘average’ stats, overall time spawned, and my average kills, ignores what’s been said about the priority, or the threat of whoever I take out.
You can cherry pick stats all you like, but it’s not going to make every explanation anything but a speculation, and when you make these speculations in the manner you want to, to make a mockery, or to pick them apart like you guys are, you’re trying to make a picture to support your silliness.
And that leads you to a genuine bias, and a problem with prejudice.
And further to that, it’s the same as these threads where there’s a good section of people making out that SPAA is ‘bad’, or that you can’t fight air in a tank, or that you don’t want to spawn it, ignoring the rest of the team, leading to someone choosing to not use it, or bother with carrying it because they just won’t use it…
Effectively leading to steamrolled games, and games where the air threat is unchecked, and left to run riot.
Much of these, are things I have stated many times before, time and time again.
Note your post doesn’t have anything to do with SPAA, and it’s nothing to do with what was being discussed with the guy who has been crying Troll to anyone who posts to them, so unless I’m mistaken, that’s just off-topic at this stage. Just arguing to argue I think, with a sprinkling of mockery for the sake of being in the train.
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/how-player-skill-with-spaa-effects-the-cas-problem/201306/2433
The fact this is now being flagged as an advertisement needs to be looked at…
That’s also talking of the game…
You want to paint me out to be the problem, but that’s just you being stupid about the discussion that’s not aligning with you, much the same as the others in here who make mention of other modes, and the need to implement that repeatedly.
The same old group, the same old worn out want…
And then all those mysterious flagging of posts, specifically the ones that make other posts make sense… Almost as if it’s strategic… ‘Advertising’ ‘off-topic’ ‘spam’, every reason imaginable… But advertising… Who’s the one throwing ‘advertising’ in as the reason.
The false flagging of these posts needs to actually stop… It’s pathetic.
Only a small part of it (about artillery) the rest is just pure troll made in order to derail and destroy the topic.
Talk about the topic please.
Absolute horse twaddle…
Stop minimising everything I say as it’s absolutely bad faith…
And every time you make out that I am destroying the topic, it’s actually an admission that you’re doing so by trying to pick arguments, as you constantly do.
Absolutely just trying to cut down any suggestion or other reason, just to pick an argument to wind everything up…
There is an actual mode where You can attack other objectives/AI units, start the game with an air unit and earn much more.
It is pure logic that if people wanted to do that with air units, they would go to play that mode.
2 Likes
No… It’s not ‘pure logic’ this is just you trying to play superior and all-knowing to cut down that suggestion.
We’re playing combined battles, we don’t need to go to another mode for the sake of the afflicted who cannot handle being got in a game.
And isn’t it hypocritical of you to make this statement, when you actually use the Yak9??? What is this circle argument nonsense… Oh wait… that’s you…
So please explain why player would choose doing the same thing for less reward?
And sorry but the only people who can’t handle being got are ones that need crutches.
And here you go again with the crutches stupidity…
Why do you use your crutches?
Why do you play GRB for less rewards that GAB?
Get the heck outta here with your circular argument stupidity ‘’‘logic’‘’…
It is actually not as, as I have said, before I talk about something I test it myself. In order to be able to talk about balance I first have to play both sides and if I want to say that something is unbalanced, then I actually have to do well in it.
You mean tanks against tanks?
As explained above. Not to mention that I’m not the one proposing AI targets and bases for air units in GRB.
If I haven’t used air in GRB and tried to talk about it that would be unprofessional and people would call me out on it as they do when someone is mistaken here.
Can we stop with Your tantrum and come back to the topic? Still waiting for an explanation why would anyone wanting to hunt down AI units/bases would do that in GRB for less reward, not to mention having to spawn first tank and earn SP rather than do that in air modes.
Edit: truth hurts
1 Like
I suggested that as an alternative to the players on the field so those afflicted may possibly stop being so cut up about it…
You know I mean your plane killstreak you touted earlier on. To even imply otherwise is just bad faith.
No it is… It is hypocritical for you to claim that you ‘test’ this as you commonly use it…
To be making out that we can go to another mode to use air is absolute peak ULQ…
This is just posturing.
There is no tantrum, yet again, you making out that there’s something there isn’t to make out that I’m the problem.
Who said it would get less rewards? It’s only you saying that to cut the suggestion down the mere second it gets put forth…
And what’s the issue with having to earn the SP to get the plane?
All of this is just a circular argument… Absolute peak ULQ…
Oh I don’t need to use it in order to do well. If You don’t trust me You can check my stats.
I commonly use it to showcase the unbalance, that is true.
There is no real reason to add something that is already in another mode as it gives You more rewards there and allows You to do it from the start.
It might be hard for You to understand but I actually care about discussion and I care if what I’m saying is true.
You should really read and stop replying before calming down.
Asking the question again: