Yeah that would be a good idea, but most people play with full lineups afaik so that would negate the point. I like your idea, but I can see some holes with ways to abuse it.
1 Like
it would just be needing some fixes/adjustments. but yeah, it would be nice… but i highly doubt they will implement it
It would be useful for air especially I think, because in ARB you don’t have lineups, and top tier is honestly pretty crazy rn, I’m trying to spade my FGR.2 but every match is 12.3 and I can’t do anything about it, because I only have 2x AIM-9D
I don’t care about my placing, but often I’m finding people bailing out because everyone else says it’s a lost cause… Or at least, that’s what they are learning from those around them.
And it’s a lot harder to learn with everyone sobbing about how bad the match is playing because they’ve already decided they’re bailing, but need everyone else to know…
yeah, for sure, that would be much easier
i play 99% ground RB, but yeah
I also never said “It’s a lost cause”, more and more imaginary made up memories yet again. You should really practice READING what people write, not imagining elaborate novels about their position that they never said and that you never ask about.
However, despite it NOT being “a lost cause”, it IS just not fun to be at the bottom BR of a match and have to sit and hide and be barely active while you wait for opportunities and side shots. It is doable. It is strategically viable. But it is BORING
1 Like
How about, for every spaded vehicle you have in your lineup, you can be uptiered 1 BR step.
For example, if I had 2 spaded vehicles I could get a maximum uptier of 0.7, with 1 spaded vehicle I could get 0.3, I think this would also help diminish the ODL problem to some extent as well.
Boring is just your interpretation of it.
Yes… it’s boring for me. And I’m the one going back to hangar, lmao. And…?
It’s also clearly not fun for the OP, so he should also go back to hangar.
If it’s fun for you, then don’t. Wow, thrilling conversation.
1 Like
nah i knew what you meant by the 1 BR step (meaning the explanation wasnt necessary, but yes, good not to assume)
and yeah, that could work… I just hate going into games where i have usually 3 or 4 tanks that are stock or very close to stock and getting wrecked, because of bad starter rounds / slower tank, etc
Yeah, I’m not usually good at explaining things and people have a habit of misunderstanding me, just making sure :)
Yeah me too, the PT-76 was a real tough stock grind for me, I found it slow, and could barely kill anything with the APCR, same as with the ISU-122, I found it not my playstyle, and getting full uptiers at every match (5.3 USSR always gets uptiers), I just oculdn’t do it, 152mm penetration point blank against königstigers just doesn’t work
1 Like
i think you simply deal with a lot of stupid people… who dont listen and have… very limited powers of deduction… buttt yeah… ive had to deal with the same things.
the Pt-76 and a few of the USA lineup with the terrible AP starting round, yup… those are ridiculous… but they are pretty few tbh, so you just have to cap a few points and get the better ammo, asap and youre good.
yeah I do, perks of being gen z
Don’t remind me about M72 and M79… please
yeah… until I run into a tiger with my stock 76 Sherman
1 Like
just shoot the tiger in the sideee, or barrel… but yeah… thats not a very ideal match up (but hey tigers are being moved up in BR… which… i dont really like… but… whatever)
Yea, only issue is that M79 is so ass it still doesn’t do anything, makes their barrel yellow, or if I hit their ammo it turns it red.
I have mixed feelings about it to be honest, I feel like the Tiger ii P would be better off staying 6.3 than going to 6.7, but the other two tigers I like being moved up (Except for the fact the E will now face IS-3, of which it has 0 chance against
I agree that the tiger II P should have stayed 6.3 but i feel the other tigers (h1 and E) should stay at 5.3 or 5.7. , but whatevs, its not that big of a deal… The real issue is Britain and how all its crap is WAY over tiered
I disagree with most of this aside from the Comet, personally I find most of it’s stuff is undertiered
I like this idea, too bad it probably wont be implemented. Im just tired of playing 9.3 and the first 5 vehicles I see are a Leo Pzbtl.
You are on crack… there is no way… 90% of britains tanks have no armor… and are easily 1 shot… but THE main issue is their ammo… Its All solid shot… and does basically nothing post pen… What BR are you up to in britains tree?
No, I’m just a British main XD
Name a vehicle and I will tell you why it is better than a vehicle of it’s same BR