You don’t care … as I said … selfish. You are making for others the game a worse experience. I can accept that it is not funny for you. But maybe you are in the mood to accept that you force others into a not funny situation. If everyone would do it like you the game would get in real trouble. And it is partly …
This behavior starts to go down to any rank right now and battles are decided within 3min now. Those battles where everyone throws 5 tanks into a battle are so rare these days but really the most challenging and rewarding battles.
I don’t want to force you to change your behavior. Just think about it. You don’t have to fight against my words. In the end we all want to have fun. The way we have fun is not always the same.
I see a small difference in Gaijin is forcing you into a situation and I get forced into a situation by other players. Gaijin makes the rules for the game. Now other beg Gaijin for a solution for a problem that hurt their fun in the game and you came along and simply throw in that you don’t care for those players.
Yeah nice but let us discuss this problem and maybe find a solution so we can have fun too like you.
I don’t think 2 high tier Premium planes counts as being a British main however. And Cent 1 is not the last vehicle in the tree, nor is 23 matches many to work out how good a tree is, respectfully.
Only because you make quite a statement of how other vehicles are better at same BR (can be, lots of vehicles/nations/BRs). And of course there is the “time you played them” relating to BR at the time, performance of AP at the time, Nations/vehicles added at the time.
As an example I spaded my Cent 3, Caernarvon, and FV4202, before stabilisers were added, and initially the AP/APDS was in a period of low post pen (and obviously lower pen compared to now). So before many other nations added and before volumetric.
Your top Brits are OK tanks, though the Avenger is amazing (was a TD when I had it), the Firefly I hate (as Avenger is a LOT better for me - and apparently for you too), the A30 Challenger again is a very good tank (purely down to speed, RoF, and the turret traverse and reload all being very good). Still all down to how AP/APDS performs on that day/patch.
However, usually to say a tank has been good for you (as you have) at least a 1 for 1 kill ratio would be expected, and maybe even spaded (I spade ALL, regardless of how poop a vehicle is, which is in part why I have too much Salt in this game). Of course the stats never show assists/hits/caps/all the things that help to win a battle/get score/RP/SL but can’t be recorded (win rate and k/d not being the be all by any means). I don’t think you have a positive ratio on ANY of those tanks, and there is a lot more than the Cent X Premium (since that comes fully spaded).
[Props to the Archer play though. And heck, you do a lot better in the Tiger 1 H than almost ANY of your Brit vehicles!]
Lol thunder skill is great. FYI I am researching the Tornado, and have up to 11.3 for tech tree, also “main” refers to what country you mainly play, which, for me is Britain
Don’t worry, I know. I just don’t play ground above 8.0 because it’s ass.
They are better than others in my experience, I don’t do well at ground, I never claimed I did, but I do better in British tanks than I do others.
APDS is stuffed ATM, doesn’t do diddly squat against anything with a mere paper plate on the outside, is objectively worse now.
Avenger is Ok, I don’t use it much.
I love the Firefly to bits, it’s an amazing vehicle.
Purely my go to vehicle in uptiers, I like the APDS for the 17 pounder,
No, it’s just what I best perform in, I am an air main and I play ground sometimes, but I’m not very good at all, never claimed to be.
I barely play the Cent X. I have played it maybe twice since APDS died.
It’s a great vehicle for me. Haven’t played it in a while though sadly.
Tiger H and E are broken vehicles. They deserve the BR raise.
One last thing, please stop using ThunderSkill… it is completely inaccurate, it shows me as having the Churchill Crocodile. I don’t own that. Never played a match in it.
Ground has enough players to function with a 0.7 matchmaker. This would limit severe tech imbalance that is currently present at some BR ranges.
I concur.
I know, just it’s an easy place to get a snapshot. And as I mention it doesn’t show anything but kills and win/loss, where there is so much more to the game (nation paired, BR, foes met, assists/teamwork, caps, etc.).
It isn’t accurate at this either, I don’t know when mine was last updated but I have been getting better recently, I used to be a horrible player which is where my low KDs come from, now I’m mid at best
My point is that you were quite strong in this:
When you do not seem to have played them as much as you think, aside from a few. You might see a change of opinion if you spend some more time around that bracket. They are not as good as they once were with the constant messing with AP. Maybe 4.0 and below is still pretty much as it’s always been.
I do not play ground much, but when I do, usually I play Britain, for I find them enjoyable and easy to use, more so than other countries (Aside from Germany). I do not play ground much. I have stated this multiple times.
You don’t care … as I said … selfish.
No, these are not the same thing
- No, I don’t care, correct
- But also no, that’s NOT selfish anyway.
Because it doesn’t hurt anyone else. Pick any one person, and I am 50% of the time on their team hurting them slightly by leaving, but 50% of the time I’m on the enemy team for them, HELPING them slightly by leaving. So they are overall completely unaffected by me long term.
In this case, I can not care and also have it not affect anyone negatively THAT I don’t care. That is, in fact, part of the reason why i don’t care. If it did affect others, I might have cared. But it doesn’t.
You are hurting the game you leave. It is not about a specific amount of time. It is the match you leave. Because the moment I see how many left the game in the first 3min of a match it hurts me. Next match is next match. But this game! This game when you or other leave is hurting me and other. I’d rather loose a match with a tough fight then a loose a match where I simply can’t stand any chance because of runaways like you.
And it is a 100% hurting for every match not 50%. Because when I get this 10 times in a row. It hurts even more … and you are happy while I just want to quit the whole game because I suffer due to behavior from players like you that are justifying this with even that you are HELPING. How sick is this … kinda narcissistic. Doing bad things and saying it is good …
Just for you to know … whatever you write now … I will not answer. I know you will not change your behavior and you know that I will not accept that this is kinda fair.
It’s good that this is just your guess, and gaijn will never confirm it, I personally have a different opinion that there is no such thing in the game
They have made it in the past, then it have been deleted because of god knows the reason,…
(it is about Queue time, if anyone didn’t knew yet)
Aaaaaaaa classic, how many times has it been like this in this game, they added something and then removed it
Too many,… but most of the time it is because of cry-babies and biased stats,…
I would like such a system in the game, maybe not based on br, but on classes at least in planes or ships, how many times in a match I had 2 fighters and 4 ju288 and every match lost and the rest of the enemy team only fighters, or ships, I have only 6.0 cruisers and one battleship in my team, and the enemy has only a battleship and almost no cruisers, And that’s a tragedy.
The bomber were limited to 4 aswell, then it somehow disappeared.
And the other 50% of the time, it helps you.
3 games you were hurt and 3 games you were helped = You were overall completely unaffected by me. (+3) + (-3) = 0
Insisting on only looking at one game makes no sense, when human beings persist over many games. It only makes sense if you know you have no argument and intentionally cherrypick to try and win a thread anyway (why you want to win an argument you already seem to know you are wrong on, as seen by the cherrypicking, I don’t know)
I dont want to win an argument. For me it’s not about winning here. It is about my feelings and the things I see and experience in the game. Calling me cherrypicker and imply that I know that I’m wrong shows even more what kind of person you are. Hf … even your way. You can believe, do and think what you like. Feel great if you want and need it that way. I respect that.
I feel not respected by you …
“The things I experience” So… are you denying that you experience a benefit when people on the other team leave their team? Because that’s the only logical conclusion left if you’re speaking from experience and not cherrypicking.
Leave it as it. I’m done with you. And its no benefit … its a shame to win that way.