Was specifically talking about the former
i dropped nukes in the CHI RI,doesnt mean its op…your type of logic
Struggles to pen a Tiger 2s cause of badly made ai code volumetric
What are you talking about? I’m saying it’s a great tank if you know how to use it, but it is far away from being OP. It doesn’t struggle to pen Tiger-II, if you do, then skill issue.
I think you have issue reading i suppose
IF THE GAME DOESNT WANTS YOU TO PEN YOU WONT PEN
My Type 2 APHE didnt penned multiple times an IS2 ON THE SIDE,you go check and wait a second…IT SHOULD HAVE PENNED,APHE tends to not pen a lot of the times cause VOLUMETRIC and i quote again since you might no be able to read properly “VOLUMETRIC”
My skills have nothing to do with anything,if the game doesnt want you to do some stuff,you simply wont
Believing in “witches” are we?
Strange that I have stats like this and I never experienced this “volumetric” ur saying lol. Just aim at places you know you’ll 100% pen and stop aiming at tracks areas from the side lol. It’s just your skill issues being filtered on forum where nobody cares, cuz if you can aim, know maps, have sitational awareness, you wont struggle at all with “volumetric”
1 Like
Thats not how volumetric works btw,nor why volumetric on this game its a big issue
Do your own research,you seem to like spending time larping in here,might as well put some time into search other posts,it doesnt take that much either
Dennying simple facts is hilarious
1 Like
Yet you have the time to cry on forum about volumetric when you are simply bad at the game. New skill unlocked
1 Like
181mm at 1 km btw
If you manage to get 0 mm close to a Tiger 2 frontally,youre probably playing against bots,the Tiger 2 will go through the HoRi like its butter,just say you have special lobbies with bots playing these tanks
These are the ones you should look for more often since in this game maps are larger than 10m / 100m and 500m
Sigh
Mh…i wonder why i struggle to pen a Tiger 2…clearly such a skill issue for knowing how volumetric works,silly me
Bad at the game yet youre the one having less rating
Guys either move it to DM’s or leave each other alone.
Anymore post of insults, stat shaming etc will result in a time out.
This an official warning
But 30% thinner
As i said, thank you
Which is huge advantage even tho it sits muh lower. And compared to M26 its laughable how good the ST-As are with HEAT-FSes and rangefinders at the same br/lower than M26
M26 is overtiered but it can also fight many tanks around this BR while being effectively frontally immune to them, while STAs instantly die to even SPAAs
Name some?
And yet they vaporize any heavy machinery that M26 cant do shit about, plus some of them having even lower BR and some having better fire rate and mobility.
Like T-44, ZSU-57-2, all the annoying autocannon light tanks that start to become really common there like BTR-80, and if you have some cover to angle with, you can stop many more powerful guns.
It has the same armor as M46 which I quite like.
so does M36B2, it’s the same cannon shared between it, ST-A1/2, and M46.
1 Like
T-44 agree, but it is basically THE WORST cannon at the rank and its still NOT invulnerable (unlike Tiger 2 for example) as it pens it easily to MG port, turret “cheecks” behind the mantlet, commander`s hatch on the turret and some other spots. ZSU-57-2 also pens its turret and commander’s hatch.
Autocannons yes, tho i believe ST-A stops at least dozen of them.
Not the exactly same if im mistaken but yeah quite close
Yes, and M36 is at the same BR as them which is hilarious
It has a much harder time penetrating you than M26 back at it, and this is assuming you are not using any cover at all which you SHOULD be using in a medium tank
If they have 20mm APDS (almost all of them) maybe only from very far away. Common ones like M53/59 can kill you from across the map
Should be the exact same. At least UFP has the same thickness and angle. M46 only changed drivetrain and cannon.
Ah no, not B2. The second one with the later 90mm. It is 5.7.
Blatant lies
1 Like