They say the game is dying and every day it seems we have another post from a veteran saying goodbye.We all laugh at the grand farewell and we say that new players will come in and that is true.Then we have another ten posts from angry players moaning about the infux of new players especially at top tier.
Hardly uprising then that we have so many relatively recent arrivals asking the same old questions.They are only old questions to older players.It is like new arrivals at a school asking a teacher an question they have heard a million times from new arrivals. Repetition brought about by leavers being replaced by newbies.
No I came here for Air RB and found it to be far from what I expected so I left it.
Then I found GRB and decided to give a go before I go.Actually really like it below a certain level.I feel it ceases to work above that level mainly for the reasons underlined by the OP funnily enough.
I don’t actually find there is balance in GRB above 6.7 with old WW2 armour facing Cold war slingers with 400mm of pen and high top speeds.Another story maybe but thanks for asking.
Yes they would, one is an SPG and it served as a defensive Anti Tank as the ones who would be driving into it would be the Soviets.
If you want a realistic semi-historical battle it would be the Swedish using WW2-era Technology in the 1960s to fight off a 1960s-era soviet invasion. I cannot make this stuff up. The Swedish like many countries unlike what you think you believe were still recovering from the 2nd Great War from only 2 decades ago. Some countries never recovered from the Middle East for example.
The fact that you want to claim that it would not just show how much you don’t understand tactics and doctrines. Hit you it wasn’t blindly charging the enemy. It was years of planning and the Sweds would never go on an offensive war, their military to this day is not designed with it in mind, and only recently have been learning.
The Swedish have always been training to fight a defensive war, and against the Soviets would not win. In the long run. Hell, the Finnish barely survived. Had the Soviets done several more operations the Finnish military would have collapsed.
Hell the only MBT they started to produce in 1958 to 62/64 don’t recall the final year. Was this the Stridsvagn 74
The chassis is from WW2 but was rebuilt and the gun is a 75mm from womp womp 1929 Only 225 were built. It’s best to round being APDS isn’t gonna make much of a difference in a Soviet Invasion and against T-54/55, 62’s, 64’s, and T-72’s. That is neglectable.
No, no not “Like I said” Your statement of removing prototypes makes no difference in how players perform you also shrink trees and make players perform worse since they’re now required to use a vehicle the way it was not intended in mind.
Prototypes also should not magically be a scapegoat cause of bad players either. They’re just bad players simple as is. You cannot change that, they want to learn their gonna have to go out of their way, but some just don’t want to. While others have improved those who didn’t are still not good at the game are now on the War Thunder Forums making an already discussed thread post since they didn’t bother looking for the other one.
That is the basic logic, start blaming yourself for not being a good player. Quit blaming vehicles. It’s not the vehicle it is you. Maps are bad I get that but that is still not an excuse to start deflecting. Now there is more I could say but I’m not gonna, these repeated thread posts are seriously annoying and provide zitch to the progress of the game they just demandy thread posts cause some bad actors to refuse to get good at the game and rather scapegoat instead of admitting…
You can, but not at all periods.
If take in mind Su-27 with it’s 1985 loadouts(without ER/ET) and F-14B of same year - everything will be fine. There will be also Mirage for example.
But soviets and other will be bad in 1975 for example, or 1980.
Theres only MiG-23 against F-14, 15, 16
