Hello everybody! Do you think that with the recent changes to certain radar missiles flight performances such as aim120, aim7, r77, mica, etc...it makes infared dogfight missiles underwhelming

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
221

It really doesn’t

222

Yo, punctuation.

Also, just learn how to flare seeker shutoff.
It’s actually pretty gimped compared to what it could be.

1 Like
223

Yo, punctuation.

224

wait until he finds out that all IRCCM missiles are underperforming in the IRCCM part (par the R-73 idk about that one)

225

Mmmmm, big map, slower gameplay, no multipath, genuine tactics 🤤
I gotta stop before I need a change of pants

1 Like
226

AMRAAMs with 5m multipath would be so peak

227

i meant more so IR missile but ARH seekers would be cool if they go changed a little, tho they are alot harder to find info about on

228

I don’t really like the idea of slower gameplay
Having missiles be hard enough to defeat to allow for larger maps also doesn’t sound like fun.

Not to mention fuel, there are top tier planes which run out of fuel despite carrying all the fuel they have available without sacrificing missiles

229

AAM-3 is harder to dodge than a fakour

230

Oh, nerfed multipath would also be nice

1 Like
231

Gee, it’s almost like you’re comparing a terrible missile vs the best IR missile for most scenarios.

232

how to ruin the game: make multipath 5 meters and NE UNPLAYABLE

233

Just

Notch

2 Likes
234

AAM-3 is underperforming

Spoiler

like most IR´s

235

notch 1000 S-300 and 1000 2s6

236

Do you scroll reels while climbing?
Nah, I get it, it definitely wouldn’t be for everyone, that’s just the kind of gameplay I like tbh

237

I dread non-gimped AAM-3
F-2A ADTW to 13.3 when

238

I mean, with props (definitely bombers) sure lol

But I don’t really play props

1 Like
239

would only be seeker and pull which is what almost every other IR missile is underperforming aswell but still scary

240

The 2S6 is quite easy to beat, especially in something with guided weapons