We’ll have to wait and see what the R-24R looks like when it gets overhauled, likely next major. So I take that with a pinch of salt currently
Well that’s to be seen, but i am talking about the current performance.
Sub-par can still be fun, at least for the odd game. Which I kinda care about more than it being “good”. But its current implementation just doesnt seem like it worth the effort to even spade it.
That’s true, in ground rb there is not much of a reason to pick it over the buc with the MITL missile at the same br
Not a lower BR anymore, Buc S2B, 200 and RDA are all 10.7.
But there is no reason to pick 4x AGM-65Bs over the AJ168s or even just good ol’ GBUs from the Jaaaaaag.
But the frustrating bit is that the Hawk 209 is also 10.7 with AGM-65Gs and a gunpod.
200 to 10.3 (in GRB)
200 RDA gets AGM-65D/Gs
and it just balances out a bit better. Also tracks with the A-10A at 10.3 and A-10A Late’s at 10.7 loadouts for 6x AGM-65B or Ds respectively
Either that or give the 200 RDA ALARM and put it at 11.3, direct SEAD equivalent to the SU-39. (and from an air PoV, they need to come up with a different method of “balancing” A2G loadouts. Because ALARM would be the perfect buff for the Hawk 200 RDA in NE right now)
1 Like
Yeah, i was remembering the old br.
1 Like
sub par can be fun when its not free RP for everyone no matter.
Harriers are sub par, but are at least actually playable
Yep, that I agree with