Has anyone felt the bias yet?

You chose t-90m as example of better…smh…bvm is WAY better than t90m.

eh maybe the little weakspot under the turret ring is why he chose that T-90M is better which hes wrong anyway

2 Likes

To go over this
If you want realism
And you want nato to be even better than what it is
I’m going to put this into perspective
This means
The SU series gets their base 1.21 TWR at 30% fuel and clean wings
This also means the TWR of all the MiG’s get adjusted as well
This also means they get their proper flight performance
This also means they get their proper load outs too
This also means their missiles track better
This means F-16
F-15
F-18
They lose out in turning performance
F-18 is only capable of 11g maneuvers and is limited to just that due to structural issues

If you want a more realistic game and want bias removed this is what removing the bias is. Cause again, the bias isn’t against nato it’s against Russia
The MiG series have a TWR at 30% of under .6
Base su series is .5 with the 30SM being .41
This was changed due to American air players complaining their plane wasn’t special enough
Which happens time and time again

ahem sources?

1 Like

Ahem
Go look for it
It’s publicly available

So you’re a believer in russian propaganda. Post up some RL stats on F-16, f-15, f-18, f-14 vs Russian made aircraft in air to air combat then.

1 Like

1- This is already in the game. Sukhois already have that TWR. 2820kg fuel, ~300kg for etc, and 16300kg empty.
With 23220kgf on the engines / 19420 = 1.2:1 TWR at mach 0.41.

Spoiler

2- This is already in the game. Migs already have that TWR.
3- Sukhois already have their proper flight performance.
4- They already have correct loadouts.
5- They already track as correctly as they can within the game.
6, 7, 8- They already have their correct turning performance.
9- F-18 is already limited to that in-game.

bias remove which mean that every tank would have accurate armor which the russian apfsds cannot pen, accurate modeling, specification, penetration, armor protection, speed, etc
mind you alot of the current NATO CAS loadout are artificially nerf due to them being OP if accurate
same with not adding accurate round for vehicle(M829A4, KE-WA3, DM63?, etc)

3 Likes

I’m getting the declassified flight manual for the F-18 hold your bridges
You wanna see what it is I gotchu man

no i want to know what sources you found this from because from my sources the Su is one of the worse T to W ratio, it recently has thermal because no thermal is oudated
and mind you they are also already ingame

Honestly will probably write a bug report with those docs to have the flight performance nerfed hard on it

go ahead

IMG_1589

1 Like

Declassified manual will NOT give you true capabilities of the aircraft! America does NOT disclose it’s capabilities! US aircraft have put down the russian aircraft in nearly EVERY engagement since the 70’s.

declassified manual also mean that the spec are changed to fit the declassified criteria
it also depend if the vehicle or system that are declassified still in service, still in use or its at that time where their spec dont matter anymore

1 Like

Wait until he finds out its sustained turn rate is over 20 degrees per second at lower fuel amounts.

nah he aint
also

Spoiler

i will not leak whats inside there because its gonna be another F-14D situation and i dont want to catch a ban

Could just ask the mod
Also with that flight manual, running calculations, and assuming best scenario it only hits 22 degrees sustained

Which again that’s nothing. Idk why you felt the need to brag about 22 degrees when all MiG variants are 24 degrees minimum
All su variants are 23-26 (depending on variant) minimum
And the instantaneous the lowest I could find was the initial MiG-29’s being 28 degrees

Name 1 time we fought their equipment and it wasn’t stripped or watered down versions

I’ll wait

The F-18C doesn’t hit 22 degrees per second in-game.
Sukhois and Migs do not reach those sustained turn rates IRL.