bias remove which mean that every tank would have accurate armor which the russian apfsds cannot pen, accurate modeling, specification, penetration, armor protection, speed, etc
mind you alot of the current NATO CAS loadout are artificially nerf due to them being OP if accurate
same with not adding accurate round for vehicle(M829A4, KE-WA3, DM63?, etc)
3 Likes
I’m getting the declassified flight manual for the F-18 hold your bridges
You wanna see what it is I gotchu man
no i want to know what sources you found this from because from my sources the Su is one of the worse T to W ratio, it recently has thermal because no thermal is oudated
and mind you they are also already ingame
Honestly will probably write a bug report with those docs to have the flight performance nerfed hard on it
go ahead
1 Like
Declassified manual will NOT give you true capabilities of the aircraft! America does NOT disclose it’s capabilities! US aircraft have put down the russian aircraft in nearly EVERY engagement since the 70’s.
declassified manual also mean that the spec are changed to fit the declassified criteria
it also depend if the vehicle or system that are declassified still in service, still in use or its at that time where their spec dont matter anymore
1 Like
Wait until he finds out its sustained turn rate is over 20 degrees per second at lower fuel amounts.
nah he aint
also
i will not leak whats inside there because its gonna be another F-14D situation and i dont want to catch a ban
Could just ask the mod
Also with that flight manual, running calculations, and assuming best scenario it only hits 22 degrees sustained
Which again that’s nothing. Idk why you felt the need to brag about 22 degrees when all MiG variants are 24 degrees minimum
All su variants are 23-26 (depending on variant) minimum
And the instantaneous the lowest I could find was the initial MiG-29’s being 28 degrees
Name 1 time we fought their equipment and it wasn’t stripped or watered down versions
I’ll wait
The F-18C doesn’t hit 22 degrees per second in-game.
Sukhois and Migs do not reach those sustained turn rates IRL.
1 Like
man you so uneducated that im scared id get your uneducated disease on me bro
do you even know what is sustain rate bro?
or you just say whatever fit ur argument
Military engines: Russia | News | Flight Global?
https://web.archive.org/web/20160117160607/http://www.umpo.ru/en/Good435_139_113.aspx
United Engine Corporation -
So what was that about sources and TWR?
Make it make sense that it has only a .41 TWR in game
You gonna drop your sources?
Or gonna keep looking like this
Wdym that is what it supposed to do
We dont want spaa that can kill aircraft from 15km with no issue(pantsir isnt far from that)
keep looking like this because theres already a big sources coming from this very own WT Forum about the F/A-18s that from other people that knows more than me about its sustain rate
also the sources you provide are blank and there isnt a mention of the sustain rate
you cant really expect to drop secondary sources and gaijin would insta fix it
if u want try bug report it
We also have the 27SK flight manual
Which I won’t post here
But there’s not really any major difference when it comes to performance since it’s the same engines and weight
Either way
Stop talking or if you’re going to please post your sources