Why is the Harry Hopkins at 2.3 when the tetrarch and some m5s are lower ?
At 2.3 this is facing 2.7-30 which is totally overpowered ,outgunned, out maneuvered etc.
At this battle rating your lucky if you disable the enemy let alone kill one maybe it should be 1.7-20 maximum to give it at least a fighting chance instead of relying on luck and the enemies favour to give you side on shots .At least give a fighting chance instead of a turkey shoot.
More like the Tetrach is OP for 1.0 after all the buffs it received.
8 Likes
just compression its not fair in slightest its by design
And there’s more to come!
This is why a lot of us British players are pushing for the light tank/armoured car line. Tetrarch could easily be 1.7 - 2.0, it’s basically a British M22.
2.0 - 2.7 are just uptier hell BR’s anyway. 2.3 has to fight M4A1’s, T-34’s, Pz III M’s and Pz IV F2’s. 2-Pdr sucks against the 3 former, and the 1 latter makes all the Infantry Tanks redundant.
5 Likes
Yeah even the B1 heavy tanks are absolute pain to play in any uptier. As long as you meet any type of sherman you are useless. Not to mention the other light tanks and such with no armour and relatively weak guns.
1 Like
idk, devs did this tank dirty. 1.7 would be MORE THAN OKAY for that tank. But its like 38T (NA) - totally overtiered.
i watched a clip on FB about british light vehicles we had the staghound AC not just AA, humber with a 2 pdr, later on we had the AEC,etc a few more would help and then the ones in the 60-70s
Im pretty sure the harry hopkins is 2.3 just so that its rank 2 and can have scouting, same with the pz38t na
Buddy, let me blow your mind.
This is just the potential for Rank I and II, and that’s not even everything.
2 Likes
tetrach is better than it ngl
The whole selling point of the HH over the Tetrarch is suppose to be armour, but they put it at a BR where the armour doesn’t really matter.
4 Likes
maybe if it was 2.0 it would matter more. Honestly i find it far better at 6.0 to sealclub hellcat players
1 Like
now delete copypaste Stuarts from here and that would be an improvement for tech tree
1 Like
Decompression of 3.3 is needed. The Shermans, T-34s and Pz IVs along with similar tanks and everything above should be pushed. Obviously there are some 3.3 tanks that can stay where they are, but the Meta of the big 3 needs to go up.
Examples that can stay would be Pz III Ausf.M, M10 and such.
Even pushing all of the above mentioned 1 step up would make 2.3, much more viable.
2 Likes
How so and most important, why so
People who can read have an advantage.
3.3 is a shitshow, absolute dominating at any downtier.
Then the M4A3 could also be repositioned at 3.3.
And any uptier absolutely dominates 3.3, so how is that a shitshow?
3.3s are worst tanks of the time, basically. So i ask for futher justification and explanation, not repeating.
No it doesnt.
No they arent.
Between 2.3 and 3.3 is a steep increase in performance of tanks. Which really isnt between 3.3 and 4.3. Both in armor and firepower.
Or how do you see a 47/32 gun fighting an M4A1 eaqual to an M4A1 fighting an T-34/76 1941.
And im not talking about just pushing the Big 3 3.3 into a higher BR, but pushing EVERYTHING above also higher. Otherwise you would compress the next BR.
Explain further lol. M4A1s, t-34-40s, P40s, ect. are easilly stomped with their further modifications. They are way worse in uptier so they are 3.3s, not 4.0s.
Yes they are. Most early modifications of the early WW2, most weak.
As much as with 3.3 to 4.3?
I mean T-34-40 isnt even a joke to fight late M4A2, lol. Not even questioning how would you fight heavy tanks with M4A1.
that makes more sense, but then again brings the question on why should 3.3 meet ONLY stronger enemies. I mean 2.3s with Pz 3J1s and T-126s are also much more versatile than 1.3s like poor early Stuarts and Pz 2s.