Honestly im fine with bomber food
I didn’t read all the replies because… too many of them.
Whilst I agree with the OP I’d add a suggestion, radar sites at top tier. 1. enemies would have more stuffs to destroy 2. it’d be realistic, modern airbases do have radars
Oh and maybe it’s just me, but economy system needs a rework
"## Enduring Confrontation
- A new tier of anti-aircraft systems (that protect airfields) for battles at Battle Rating 10.7+ have been added:
- USA: ADATS
- Germany: Osa-AK
- USSR: Osa-AKM
- Great Britain: ADATS (M113)
- Japan: ADATS
- China: Tor-M1
- Italy: Osa-AKM
- France: ItO 90M
- The Battle Rating ranges that determine the models of AI aircraft (bombers, assaults, reconnaissance aircraft etc.) have been changed:
- #1: 1.0-2.0 → 1.0-2.3
- #2: 2.3-3.3 → 2.7-3.7
- #3: 3.7-4.7 → 4.0-5.3
- #4: 5.0-6.3 → 5.7-7.3
- #5: 6.7-7.7 → 7.7-9.0
- #6: 8.0-9.3 → 9.3-10.3
- #7: 9.7+ → 10.7+
- At Battle Rating 10.7+, a separate set of vehicles is now used in the template: attack aircraft, reconnaissance aircraft, and bombers. Previously, for all ranks above 8.3, the same set of vehicles was used in these templates.
- A new rank for reconnaissance aircraft has been added, and the previous ranks have been changed so that aircraft from all nations are roughly equal at each battle rank:
- China:
- #6: IL-28 → Q-5 early
- #7: F-104A → JH-7A
- France:
- #4: PB4Y-2 → AD-4
- #6: Etendard IVM → Super Etendard
- #7: Mirage IIIC
- USSR:
- #6: IL-28 → Yak-38M
- #7: Su-7B → Su-24M
- Great Britain:
- #7: Lightning F.6 → Tornado GR.4
- Germany:
- #7: F-104G → F-5E
- Italy:
- #5: P.108B serie 2 → F-84G
- #7: F-104S → Tornado IDS
- Japan:
- #6: T-2 → AV-8S
- #7: F-1 → F-5T
- China:
- The selection of attack aircraft for the Battle Rating of 10.7+ has been changed to better match the aircraft for different nations:
- USA: F-104C → F-5E
- USSR: Su-7B → Su-24M
- Germany: F-104G → Su-22M4
- Italy: F-104S → Tornado IDS
- Japan: F-104S → F-5T
- Counterattack logic has been returned to ground combat logic. Now, after a battle ends, if the attacking side was successful, there is a 50% chance that the losing side will counterattack in an attempt to retake the lost grid square.
- A bug where Team A ground convoys were not generated has been fixed.
- A bug where missions to protect and destroy ground convoys would freeze and not respond to the destruction of convoys has been fixed.
- A convoy is now considered destroyed if fewer than 3 vehicles remain. The remaining vehicles are destroyed automatically."
So they are updating it now. But this will lead to bases being inside the no escape zone of those missiles. Before implementing this they should move bases further away from airfields. In some of the maps this is also one sided.
They are updating sim. It’s a start.
Now we need more maps added to EC.
Golan heights?
Holy Molly, I see EC changelist. Where does it come from?
You can.
How do you download it? I can’t seem to find a downloadable format.
rename to blk
I saved it into the user missions file but it didn’t show up in the game
I thought you used the CDK before :p
You need to host it as a custom battle… google it
I don’t understand what you mean. I could only download it as a raw file so I downloaded it and save it as a blk file. I saved it and moved it into the user missions folder and still didn’t see it in-game. I’ve done that with other missions before from war thunder live.
you have to have a whole folder of stuff… its all linked.
Interesting! Thank you for sharing this.
By the way, do you know why multi-vehicle SAM systems do not work in custom battles?
Yes, and (as I understand) you also need to download other linked files (like “gameData/missions/templates/air_templates/aat_aaa_template.blk”)
Im a total noob when it comes to this but when I found the datamine realised that a group of players could work together to not only fix the issues in sim but ADD MAPS.
Assuming Gaijin would implement them…
did you get it working?
Naw I couldn’t figure out how to get anything but the raw files. I couldn’t save it as a blk.
you just rename them… :p
I did rename them. It didn’t work
So, there was no answer regarding EC updates. Obviously, no work is to be done


