Never really bothered with the F5E when i had the A7E which imo was and in some cases is still stoinked. Also idk why but agm 65 a arent much different from B and yet ive had so many moments where at the last second they turn and miss a staionary target.
The AGM65As and AGM65Bs are more different than ever before. The AGM65As can really only lock a moving target from 2km/3km, where as the AGM-65Bs can lock on and track, mostly reliably, from up to ~6km to ~7km, but in this video it shows that 8km is possible too.
I originally thought that Gaijin’s adjustments were aimed at alleviating the issue of attack aircraft having excessively high BRs in ARB, but clearly, Gaijin does not think so. Look at the A-7D and A-7E; they are far inferior to the Hunter F58 in air combat, yet their BR in ARB is 0.7 higher. Similarly, aircraft like the Buccaneer, Jaguar, and MiG-27 are facing the same issue. Even more absurdly, Gaijin considers it reasonable for the MiG-21 SMT, MiG-21 MF, and MiG-21 BIS to share the same BR in GRB. On the contrary, the Sea Harrier FRS1, which also lacks LGB, has not seen any changes to its BR in GRB.
5 Likes
As for why the Q-5L’s Air RB BR is not aligned with the early Q-5, which also lacks chaff and flares, but instead is the same as the Q-5A, I hope it’s because Gaijin decided to add chaff and flares to the Q-5L, rather than because Gaijin overlooked the fact that the Q-5L is inferior to the Q-5A.
1 Like
Way to achieve the absolute opposite of why this change had been requested. Instead of making attackers more viable and accounting for all-aspect missiles, just shaft them in the one singular mode they are made for. AMX at 11.0, what are you smoking? What is even the point? Why do you adhere to the principle of not looking at lineups? It clearly makes no sense for an attacker!
3 Likes
I clearly don’t understand people who is upset by giving F-16 lower BR telling that jets have mavericks. Guys ,are you okay? I don’t have researched 7 Rank of aviation but I saw and see how players on mavericks complain that they cost too much but have no damage at all.
Second. Giving A6-E Intruder and A10-A 10.7 push them to play against Pancir because in WT vehicles don’t play on own BR, why people who spent their money on Thunderbolt and Intruder don’t stand for their money, why developers only fixing those jets, why premium and not premium Su25’s never have gotten increasimg BR, they continue destroying 9.3. I think it’s not fair and awful.
*More than 8km ;)
The Ayit moving up is a no-brainer as that thing in a downtier is straight out cheating. Maybe 9.7 would do the trick, but it might be okay at 10.0. Now the Israeli A-4 Early (M) moving a whole 1.0 BR up is a bad move. It’s not fair, also. 9.3 is where it belongs
2 Likes
R-73s do not belong at 11.0
3 Likes
The SU-25BM is at 11.0 with r73s and its the exact same as the rest of the su-25s with r73s, its a subsonic flying brick at 11.0, if you die to it im calling skill issue.
1 Like
Kid named full uptier in a flareless 10.0/10.3 jet:
2 Likes
This already happens in game, people are fighting things with better flight performance and all aspects like the mig 21bis which you guessed it sits at 11.0, so it doesn’t matter if the more modern su-25s get brought to 11.0.
Concerning its ARB Br is dropping to 9.3 I don’t think so.
These changes are great. Love to see the A7’s being moved down in air RB. I don’t know why people are complaining. There seems like there are a lot of really good balance changes. Sense you moved the one Su-22 to 12.7 does that mean an increase in ground BR? It is good to see a lot of these planes go up and down in BR for there ground battles. Especially the British ones sense they got a lot of guided weapons at 10.3, but hopefully at 10.7 they will be a little more balanced. Great work keep it up!!!
well, does it actually matter, if you got no flares on 10/10.3 on full uptier, is that missile r60, 9L or r73. That R73 is last what you face , since that SU is last on battlefield anyway :D
Not to mention, how much it actually loses momentum, since it’s launched below mach 1 and no hmd.
1 Like
There is a dramatic difference between the R-60M and the R-73…
As CAS lovers would love to say:
Skill issue
How is this a skill issue? Breaking lineups for some nations while leave others intact?
Or instead of moving down jets that do poorly in air RB they raise them in ground RB…what does that have to do with anything?
1 Like
oh no 9Ls below a certain BR a tragedy, its not like the platform it is on is a complete and total whale and even a mildly competent pilot can stay out of its line of fire.
if you can’t deal with those missiles without flares when they are mounted on a flying bus it is genuinly just a skill issue.
how the hell am i supposed to unlock modifications in a reasonable time span if not in air RB with a goddamn plane? man you keep extending comedy hour “a crutch” get a grip dude.
Edit just to add, we are not going to have a productive conversation.
You will probably believe I have the skill issue, I believe you have the skill issue and are making some horrible jokes with the “no all aspect missiles below 11.0” and all.
I think that the br changes for the A4s are overkill the A4E should go to 9,3 and the ayit to 9,7 because they are very slow and rip their wings off at the slightest turn
1 Like