Yeah, this is even noticeable in the blast damage of aircraft shells.
I compared the destruction power of different shells against aircraft wings and Mineshells cause more structural damage compared to thicker walled explosives shells.
I’ve noticed a lack of respect from USA players towards the 341. It’s like something out of a movie. Lil bro calling over a big bro to try ambush the apex predator that doesn’t stand for said ambushes.
1 Like
Haha, I have since replaced SturmTiger with Kugel. But to be fair, Allied CAS hasn’t been a real issue with all the 341 running around. I’ve been dropping those 2x2500KG bombs of the JU288, quite a bit though. I forgot how good that plane was. Though, to be fair, when I last used it - it didn’t even have access to the 2500kg bomb. The self-sealing fuel tanks and its ability to just put out fires in general. No wonder the bots use that thing to base bomb in ARB during events.
1 Like
there is literally no reason that should be able to pen a T 34…
or stop defending a tank that literally never existed and shouldnt be in the game anyways
Rubbish. Especially the side armour. Heavy tanks don’t have universally heavy armour on all sides. Him reversing and exposing his side was the worst thing he could have done.
2 Likes
the only reason its even being played enmass right now is because of the bug and the op ass shell it shouldnt have gotten because again and i cannot stress enough IT NEVER EXISTED
no i complain about the 2s38 and i own it too but guess what i rarely touch it and the turm isnt that op to begin with it has no armor is light enough for a light tank classification and still isnt a light tank and it tends to struggle against russian vehicles so again only one coping here is you the 341 is an op aphe dispenser just as the 2s38 is an op apfsds dispenser if you have a problem with the turm go into the forum page about it and like you told me cry about it
That’s my main issue with auto cannons, their ability to find pixel sized armour holes or just spam you so hard the server gives up and just kills you so it doesn’t have to deal with it anymore.
The other issue is SPAAs being uptierd due to their anti tank capabilities to the point they struggle to deal with planes, the ZSU-57-2 and Falcon being the 2 best examples. If the ZSU got the same VT round as the Chinese one and went up to the same BR it would help.
If those 2 issues are addressed I would have far less issue with the SPAAs AP rounds.
But this is ridiculous and needs fixing:
1 Like
people: * complain flakpanzer is OP *
also people: * drive side on in front of flakpanzer *
8 Likes
Yes, a lot of people complain about the Flakpanzer 341 when they do this. Positioning is very important when fighting against this vehicle but even with good positioning, it can still be pretty hard to confront this vehicle. I made this thread to discuss the problem of it doing things it shouldn’t like destroying vehicles front-on that would be near impossible for other SPAA especially in the 5.3 to 8.0 range (With the BR changes 5.3 and 5.7 won’t have it anymore). I know a lot of people will point out the ZSU-57-2 having APHE and the ZSU-57 having HVAP with a lot of pen at 3.3 is “OP” but its the high rate of fire, APHE rounds with a lot of penetration, and protection that made the Flakpanzer 341 overpowered at its former BR (It still is OP at 7.0+).
1 Like
Bros malding
5 Likes
The flakpanzer 341 and other SPAAs are perfectly fine for the game.
1 Like
SPAA’s are an essential part of the game. The Flakpanzer 341 is a great SPAA, don’t get me wrong, but its performance against tanks (Especially heavy tanks like the IS3 and Object 279) way beyond its capabilities is crazy.
2 Likes
Lol, he definitely is.
1 Like
The T34 side armour is around 80mm, broadly comparable to the Tiger II’s in thickness. At point blank range, even a Chaffee or a Puma will punch through that side armour and he would have been just as dead. Reversing like that might have been worth it if the enemy on the other side of the rock had to reload the main gun after taking out the Scorpion, but this was not the case here.
Just casually admitting to TOS violation on the forums? Why?
Guns were built in metal.
3 Likes
not sure if casually having multiple accounts is a vio. since ive seen ytbers have f2p vs p2w accounts
2 Likes
3.4. User shall not create multiple Accounts.
3 Likes
welp, ig those ytbers gonna have to… deal with it
2 Likes
Blackmail them /s
4 Likes