doesnt that technically make them suggestable.
ALSO MORE REAL THAN OSTWIND II!!
1 Like
Sadly not, i already asked, as the Gerät 341 isnt unique to the Flakpanzer 341, since the guns were also planned as field mounts and on ships.
planned only though. not used?
Well only 4 were build for testing, so no. They didnt see any service.
hmmmm
so only 4 built, planned for flakpanzer 341 and naval mounts… but naval mounts dont have mockups even?
I suppose they were to replace the Flak 42. But i havent seen anything more detailed.
I have to admit that I’m confused by the definition of “unique” in this case.
Field mounts are no concern to us in WT because we only deal with vehicles.
Ships are a different matter but still we’re talking about a situation where no other vehicle that could possibly be featured in GRB would ever have access to those guns.
God I wish the rest of WT would just start following naval standards already.
Even tho it wouldnt (currently) find use to the game, its about the vehicle itself, as partial vehicles can be suggested and implemented if parts for it like hull or turret and such were build. However the guns arent counted towards the vehicle because they werent ONLY for the vehicle. I didnt do the rules, i was just told that by the suggestion mods.
Here by @Beeschurger
4 Likes
Personally I think they should give it HVAP and buff the pen on the Wirbelwind and Ostwind as well…
Honestly i kinda like the Flakpanzer 341 but it’s OP it should go to 6.7 and have it’s turret armor be made out of actuall wood or have it nerfed some other way
1 Like
i remember a source stating that horizontal turret drives were ordered to be made and delivered for this vehicle?
If you find that again, i guess it would be possible.
It’s far too OP, it should lose the Explosive shell and go to solid shot or decrease the pen.
This tank at 8.0 can still take out most medium tanks, it’s absolutely disgusting.
Totally ruining 6.3-7.3 games.
i think the rotation speed should be like panther, for balance
Balance? This would just make the vehicle useless… its an spaa.
6 Likes
nah its a td
1 Like
Она разбирает даже ИС6М в фронтальную проекцию, какие проблемы на 6.7+?
It will become a poor SPAA. It should just lose the improvement it just received and stay at 6.3.
Alot SPAAs have this kind of pen or more, even at much lower BRs. Should I remind you on every single one of these? ZSU-37 at RB BR of 3.3 (!), HVAP 87mm pen and many, many more from alot different nations.
Its just that so far German SPAAs were capped at around 50mm penetration up to 7.0 Kugelblitz, since their higher pen ammo was denied so far. The HVAP for MK103 (Kugel) was even nerfed down to 70mm pen or something.
So players got used to anemic Ger SPAA vehicles, which could barely defeat any ground vehicle with 50mm pen at 10 m. While they’re sporting high pen SPAA themselfs from ZSU-37 at 3.3 up to Leopard 1 SPAAs with almost 100mm pen at 6.0 or something.
Its just fair to give Ger SPAAs their higher pen shells as well. All of them should get them tbh.
Its just fairplay. Players need to adapt as Ger players had to. It never had been fun to play Panzer IV vs. ZSU-37. So…why should it be different for others?
I’m fine with 341 going up to 6.7 or even 7.0. But there are more elements at play that should be considered. 341 is only played by experienced players, while many of the USA teams it faces have no idea what they’re doing and how to take on the 341. There are some skill issues at play on those allied teams. Have had tanks exposing their side armour constantly trying to chase my 341 around. We’ll see allied teams adapt to it and improve how they’re conducting themselves in battle.