Player struggling to dodge a missile with worse G pull than a 9B . . . telling another player they have a skill issue.
Makes about sense.
being worse than a 9G doesnt make it bad. the 9E is a capable missile even at 10.3.
the problem is that you have a good radar missile well before RWRs are a thing, facing planes that often have 9B at best. with no flares let alone chaff
the premise itself is wrong as well, aim 7C does not pull worse than aim 9B
yeah, the AIM-7C dose have a ~2.5 sec guidance delay which is about 1km of distance after that it will pull a consistent 11.4G for 6 second before it starts to drop off, compared to the AIM-9B that hits a max of 8.2G
We should put AIM-7Cs on an SPAA at 9.0 and see how Pangolin feels about it then!
Are you also one of those people who thinks the Aim-4s regularly hit 27Gs?
Depends on if it faces props or not. Going by Gajin’s previous BR trends, it would likely be placed at 5.0 or 6.0.
nope, pointing out your logical anomaly doesnt mean i have one as well
Your logical anomaly is living in some imaginary idealistic world where the Aim-4 always pulls 27Gs, the Aim-7C always pulls 15Gs, and the F3H’s radar never randomly loses tracking.
In other words, you have either never played the vehicles you’re talking about, or you just had too large of skill issue to stick around at 9.0 and learn how to properly counter common planes.
not the worst thing in the world. a lot of sparrows have that problem. fire them at about 3.5km and youre hitting a front aspect shot pretty well.
1 Like
i never even mentioned Aim-4s, where did you pull that from? your fantasy world?
you calling me a skill issue while you join an argument regarding the BR that you practically dont even play is a comedy for me. enough said, just play the game and you’ll prob get there
not to mention your only argument so far was that people have “skill issue” that they play early jet BRs, where you struggle yourself.
maybe seek improvement next time
yeah, the biggest issues with the early sparrows wasn’t the tracking delay itself, it was that pre-buff the minimum/ maximum range was so close together you had a very small window to get a hit between when the missile started tracking and when it lost too much energy to hit, now with the drag buffs the range has been extended so the missile still has lots of energy left by the time it’s guidance times out, you can’t see it in the screen shot I posted but it holds a solid 11g for a good 6 seconds before it starts to lose energy and the Gs drop off and even pulling max G it’s still going over 1000kph when it times out.
You have played exactly one game in the f3h post-buff for 1 kill and 1 death.
4 Likes
this dude is just there to piss ppl off, dw about it
he doesnt know what hes talkin about anyway, he has no argument
Trust me, i am very familiar with this guy.
Im not taking much seriously from mr.(i uptier planes in ground rb and complain the spaa more than 1.0br higher kill me easily)
oh he has the same logical ground for GRB as well?
Search him up in any SPAA thread
I know that from skyflash dogfight. what a crap missile that was paired up with the ass radar of the F-4k/j pre buff.
Ive been abusing the F/A-18a at 12.3 a lot recently as sparrow rolling no longer exists, that was already a 12.7 worthy aircraft and it really is now that sparrows are better.
YUUP
He is a big cas main. His logic is that any spaa that can engage him before he bombs is op.
He is also kind of a US main. He is a bit less of one now judging by stats.
lol expected so
hes a frustrating type of person to have a civil debate with for sure
Actually a great argument against all the noob F3H whiners. I don’t really care to play the F3H, so I have no biased incentive for it to be nerfed or buffed.
I’d say that name calling disavows your argument, but you haven’t made one (atleast not in your favor) to begin with.