I didn’t say it is suffering more. I highlighted it is shafted by this addition, but even if we think it isn’t shafted that badly, there’s a whole list of things that are and should probably be more the center of discourse (tornadoes, harriers, attackers in general at the rating). So the principle of the F18 being too low is correct, even if we disagree with their example.
I was talking abotu the original post not what you said. sorry for the confusion.
1 Like
It is 0200, I am too sleepy to parse these kinds of things apparently. 😿
Well, if you set your clock to the correct time it wouldnt be 2am. its 3:30pm :P
I am not forced to put up with the English yet. Several years down the line perhaps, but not yet.
1 Like
Your problem is not the BR of F/A-18A, it is the BR compression. MLD (or any other 11.3/11.7 for that matter) cannot really go down any further simply for the fact that it will bully 10.3/10.7 even harder than F/A-18A. They need to increase BR ceiling and narrow matchmaker BR range from 1.0 to 0.7 otherwise you’ll face this issue one way or the other.
1 Like
It’s not any one plane. Compression is really bad for jets. Only naval is worse
It’s a standard move. Top premiums destroy balance because they are OP or players are bots and leave after the first death.
MICA-EMs are AIM-120Bs with thrust vectoring, France is the most OP nation in-game, at least before the Su-30SM
even the eurofighter wins against a su30sm…
you havent unlocked top tier so ofcourse you know nothing about it
2 Likes
You’re opinion on the FGR.2/FG.1 seems way understated. When I played the FGR.2 during the ML/MLD’s prenerf state, I was beating them in almost every scenario outside of instantaneous turn rate.
They couldn’t out rate the FGR.2 if you forced them into an energy fight and sometimes even a flat out turn fight if it was done correctly.
The FGR.2 is one of, if not the best phantom to dogfight with as it doesn’t have problems other phantoms have which is energy retention and thrust.
The Skyflash DF is also a really good missile but most try to use it for BVR, it’s actually intended use is for close range (1.2-6km) launches and getting them in great offensive scenarios.
But if you have any form of evidence to back up that the FGR.2 is one of the worst phantoms in the game, by all means, do tell me.
oh cmon, dude.
u’re going to still bullying me?
someone tell me how to report/flag this guy
su-30sm has better radar and better missiles, and thrust vectoring helps when dogfighting
and the EF-2000 got a lot of nerfs and now its radar isn’t what it was before
I am probably a decent player, and when dogfighting in a ef2000 against a su27/su30sm you win like 8 or 9 out of 10 times…, if you do it without missiles then the ef2000 cant lose if flown properly. I have tested it in a 1vs1.
the ef2000 just keeps alot of energy and gets them much faster back than the su30sm… it has worse acceleration than a su27sm, and thrust vectoring doesnt help…
1 Like
i did 4 kills in 2 matches, 3 kills in 6 matches, 2 kills in 3 matches, 1 kill in 1 match and 0 kills in 4 matches this day, so don’t tell me im a noob player, dude.
if u’re fighting high it can helps cuz u can’t stall straight to the ground, at least that what i think.
i saw it’s very useful when doing 1v1
yes, it can help the thrust vectoring, but you dont get the enemy the eurofighter that slow. this energy advantage will cost the su30sm the fight…
1 Like
all depends of the pilot. a good Su-30SM pilot could annihilate an EF-2000 pilot.
and viceverse