GALWAYLION = someone that plays the game for fun and not for obligation
1 Like
Cool, you use the interwebs and pull stats from some website. I used to do the same with baseball cards. Do people even still collect baseball cards anymore?
Also, obviously we have different playstyles. I prefer flanking and shooting from the side within 10km, which Su-30s tend to be easy targets. Can’t really flank someone who is orbiting the bloody moon.
Nothing wrong with @GALWAYLION playing the game for fun
But maybe he should refrain from making statements that aren’t very correct
1 Like
I flank around and go about 5500m alt, just below contrail range and get within 18km or so and launch at f15E’s. Not too difficult since they can’t seem to figure out how to notch
I finally decided to say screw it and just bought every top tier premium for every other country I still need to grind and am just hanging out in Sim bombing, and then grinding out the other planes in Realistic. I only want Rank VIII anyways to fight with.
Simply don’t need to since you can launch it mostly straight upwards sometimes and it will hit most of the time, since missiles perform better at higher altitudes and planes perform worse
I wish I fought your American mains. The mates I fight are going top Mach notching every five seconds. I usually let my teammates go after them while I go after Jas39s, MiG 29s, Su-27s, and Su-30s. Easy prey for me weirdly enough. Which is honestly sad, since I loved using the Grippen in 1v1s, but in Pubs they are terrible.
Just about everything you mentioned in the post after mine would be fixed by the .07+/-BR spread change. Less so a too tiers but decompression can fix that will minor tweaking but as far as 90% of the other tiers on both air and ground it would fix the vast majority of the game. And once it’s implemented a correct BR decompression throughout the whole game can BR done because the data points will be more refined.
Ironically everyone keeps using graphs and personal experience, but doesn’t take into effect that if they tweaked the BR spread, everything would vastly change on paper. W/L ratios, performance and game lengths. Player retention.
The perfect example is the F18C Early against the Mig23ML, using premiums for all intense purposes to make it fair, completely wrecks the Mig23ML. But still be pitted against the F4S/FC1 is a more fair fight. And it would never see the likes of 13.7. Where both the F18C’s don’t even belong due to lack in actual avionic/electrical performances. Not including The F18C late is absolutely the worst 14.0 jet in the game compared to everything else, it’s more of a 13.3BR Jet. (The jet should have been implements after the release of the F14 along side the Mig29SMT.)
I completely agree. Another thing would be splitting things up into categories: Biplanes and Props, Early Jets, and Missile Jets (I would put this one around 11.0 due to All Aspects and decent Radar Missiles). Split them into categories, so then jets of a different grade are not fighting them (like how a J32B should not be facing an A-10A).
Lmao.
I have the blud muted but seeing as in the other thread, he claimed that MEXAS on Strv122s is useless, i can only imagine what the man was saying about AMRAAMs.
Still mad I don’t care about your French Guinea package on a Leopard?
Also, tell the truth. You’re mad because I called you out on you regurgitating YouTube Shorts. You never once played Sweden, yet you claimed they were the most OP nation in War Thunder. You don’t have any real time put into France, yet you claimed France was one of the strongest nations in War Thunder. I called you out on that, and you went into a hissy fit and mass reported me. I could care less about the Argentine Package, especially since you used WIKIPEDIA as your source for why the Stridsvagn 122 was OP. You didn’t even use some stat card thing like that guy, you used WIKI bloody PEDIA as a source for a WAR THUNDER vehicle.
I at least admitted I was wrong, and said I had bias against the AIM 120s since I’ve gotten smacked by them more often than R-77-1s. You couldn’t accept the fact you were wrong and did not know a thing you were talking about.
not proven by anybody on this forum yet I believe?
1 Like
Neat! Did you know this chart doesn’t take into account DRAG IN MANEUVERS AT ALL??!?!?! Planes don’t fly in straight lines.
2 Likes
you have to be trolling in the other direction
1 Like
It also assumes that the launching plane has similar performance, which you know is not the case in actuality lol
I.E
at 40s, F-15E reaches 1518kph (Chart 1), while an Su-30SM reaches 1350kph (Chart 2)
1 Like
Wait, I thought we were agreeing together since the R-77-1s have more drag
You are implying the R-77-1 is worse in close range; this is false, simply.
1 Like
Ah, okay cool. Sorry sir.
Do you think the MiG-23s in this lobby are fair to face me
You should have played the Mirage IIIC frfr
1 Like