No, it is your problem who cannot accept the explanation of others.
Stop playing words, and stop derailing the topic.
THIS THREAD is ORIGINALLY aimed about
‘F-5C(USAF) and F-5A(Thai) are awful compared to NF-5A(Dutch) or F-5A(ROCAF). so how are we need to solve the problem’
And you are telling
“Every F-5 are ass, I am right, even though my stats are awful, I don’t want to hear others speaking”
Caern explained why F-5 is hard to play.
-Because F-5 are gun STR fighter
I suggested solution to make those ‘being less-worse than counterpart’
-give them AIM-9J/P to tie.
you came out and
-skill issue of US main are myth (while having terrible stats.)
while cherrypicking and quotemining things.
We all wants to get F-5A(Thai) being compete compared to F-5A(ROCAF)
but, your movements in here aren’t helpful, in same level of Gaijin’s update. fr.
Look at us all now, we are discussing F8F-1 in F-5A topic.
Partially, Decompression is also needed.
but in the context of this thread, F-5A(Thai) and F-5C(USAF) need to get AIM-9J equivalent first.
to let them make work as same as F-5A(ROCAF) does.
They need polishing FIRST.
probably because F-5 needs high skill. unlike prop era, in missile jet era, turnfighter needs higher skills compared to missile bus
you need to take perfect chance while missile buses engage in third-partying engagement and just stealth-firing missiles behind.
I mean, typical missile busses that cannot dogfight, such as SHAR FRS.1 or Bucc S.2B, are straight awful compared to F-5C, but they are infinitely easier to use.
While F-5C is still barely keep things up but hard to play for newcomers.
Its spec still meets for being its BR. but needs polishing, with decompression.
and AIM-9J. (bc some F-5s in same BR have those, while others can’t.)
They are in the sweetspot.