Gotta say, what you have discussed in regards to the Su-57 has been much more informative and puts information that I’ve heard into significantly better context. I respect it as a functioning stealth aircraft now at least.
Deflects nuke, hires doom slayer, I win.
Might be related, but would the JATM and PL-15 come to this game?
Not related, I’m jp, idk
Wdym?
Maybe use this thread for PL-15
Or this one for both
Basic shape, parts, etc are wrong so no. Might as well be less than 10% accurate.
what exact part are wrong?, How is it less than 10% accurate?, You can’t just baselessly claim it is wrong just because the result doesn’t follow your belief. I would like to any simulation in public sector doing better than that
Better images have surfaced of the intake on the internet since the simulation was made.
The resolution of the model is extremely poor. The intake shape is wrong. The simulation is not valid.
This thread has better images and explanation in regards to the workings of the Su-57 intake.
On the note of the F-22, the air bypass doors and other systems are visible in this image:
Yeah, the resolution of the simulation isn’t the best but to say that it is “extremely poor” is huge exaggeration especially when compared to other simulation that is available in public sector, unless you can rent an anechoic chamber it doesn’t really get better since they all based on mesh. Besides, even the physical model that Central Scientific Research Institute of the Aerospace Forces of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation ( NII VVKO) used for RCS prediction of F-35, F-18 …etc aren’t really that accurate to the real thing to be honest.
Blockquote
This thread has better images and explanation in regards to the workings of the Su-57 intake.
I have read that thread several times before, I still I don’t see how exactly you come up with the conclusion that the inlet shape is so wrong that the simulation is invalid. Especially when we consider that the slanted blocker will cause multi bounce reflection, then with RAM inside the inlet, the multi bounce will reduce reflection strength by -50dB due to multi bounce. So even if they manage to get the inlet shape 99% wrong, the reflection from there only contributed a small part in the total RCS
1 Like
Other sims being extremely poor doesn’t make this one any less poor
The models give only a general idea.They don’t give accurate data
Moreover, the air intakes are not modeled at all
P.S I forgot to write it.The models and grid modeling of those guys is shit.
We first need to see how the gameplay with new Fox 3 goes. Adding such modern stuff isn’t good for a game and would be just useless for everyone who wants to enjoy top tier. Its just my opinion but war was always a race about who has the better weapons so its pretty hard to balance it. Cuz they always waant to be better then the other once. Most important is that there is not really a plane which is as strong as such a plane. Maybe as a boss fight but this won’t be added I’m sure.
being poor or good is relative, it hard to argue that something is of bad quality when there isn’t anything better. In this case, the even the physical model used by NII VVKO are quite far from the shape of the real plane