they dont really care sometimes(or actually most of time). just doing like they believe, sometimes(WELL… quite a lot of time tbh) without ground on documentation
that looks so sick
That’s an early iteration of the LJDAM-ER, which, btw, is still missing on the F-15
ljdam er is also missing from f16c
Yea, unfortunately
This is taken from the F-14 thread but is still relevant here.
Unfortunately, it appears we cannot use any documents that are marked with anything other than Distribution Statement A unless it is accompanied by a FOIA.
1 Like
I think the bug reporting devs on the bug reporting site accept it either way though, they already accepted numerous bug reports using either manual
1 Like
Interesting, but on the other hand I wouldn’t be surprised if they clamp down on using these, given the confusion.
It was released by the National Guard! It was accepted on several bug reports! Cut it out! You’re not going to prison
1 Like
Lol good to know, just didn’t want anyone to get banned by Gaijin over a misunderstanding.
Lets be real, I don’t think the US gives 2 shits about what some old manuals are used for lmao.
2 Likes
In GRB every patch more and more ARH and IR missiles, but we still waiting BOLs.
True. This and the TGP and cm fix
the issue i see on that image is that it uses an aim7 and an aim120 at the same time
thats cursed af
and even worse it uses a Python 4/5 at the same time as the aim9
4 Likes
I didnt even see the 9 at first
I guess they just use those and sparrows because they are cheap and sitting around in a warehouse
1 Like
2x 1000lb JDAM
1x 500lb JDAM
1x AIM-9L/M
1x AIM-7M
1X AIM-120B
2x Python 4/5
1x E-War Pod.
Its a varied loadout for sure haha.
7 Likes
shooting down drones doesn’t require advanced ordnance
Keeping missiles that old in inventory does cost money though.
1 Like
@tripod2008 @MaMoran20-psn
Do you have this document?
Post in thread ‘McDonnell-Douglas F-15 Avionics, AN/APG-63/70 radar’ McDonnell-Douglas F-15 Avionics, AN/APG-63/70 radar | Page 3 | Secret Projects Forum
2 Likes