F-15 Eagle: History, Performance & Discussion

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HGnvdjS5pu9k
They don’t want to. They can make the F15A match but not the F15C.

2021-01-16 (3)
Cause this is obviously much more reliable…and on the dev the radar range was the 80km before to the "upgrade of the 100km we’ve had since F15A went live.
and russians(or ex soviet) are quite deep into the belief that the SU-27’s radar(N001) was as good as the original(and possibly PSP) APG-63.
“Aviation in the Lebanon conflict” - Col. V. Dubrov

Spoiler



2024-07-07 (3)

Even westerners didn’t know the full capability and even the original pre-FET AMP(1978) 63 was superior to a production N001.

Spoiler

2024-07-07

And if you go above the thread you’ll find him claiming NCTR isn’t reliable despite it being the one of reason the F15 could do BVR shots without AWACS.
Its a whole bury your head in the sand thing.
image

8 Likes

Well
About thrust maybe make another report?
I have some graphs, that tells pit od thrust must be smaller on -220, and highrr maximal thrust. Starting from 1.2(±) mach.(way earlier than in wt)
I already sent them in another thread, i dont remember which, but possibly releated to thrust of F-15C

Also, i have some videos that proves that envelope in wt is wrong

1 Like

If memory serves, the Russians tried the same thing with R-27ERs, and it was equally crap.

Theoretically, it seems like it should be fairly straight-forward, but there’s not much evidence any of these systems moved on past some early tests, since active radar missiles were already replacing SARH ones.

Tried with Su-30/35 maybe

Gaijin will give AIM-7 to you as 1 tier missile, bruh

F-15 fuselage generates about 1/3 of the total lift

2 Likes

From what I’ve discovered so far, using NCTR has been a bit problematic. I’m just guessing that it was used on the APG-70 and then on the APG-63V1 and not on the older versions of the -63 ?

It was a thing even before the RAM got removed out of the OFP.


( TWS AND RAM was still a thing)
So came around 85’ with TWS.

And its impossible for just apg 70s and v1s to have it as it was one of the reasons F15Cs lead during DS. V1s came later in 90s, only last 43 Cs came with apg70 and for A2A there isnt much difference between 70 and 63. It was also planned for the 63s to have them.

1 Like

Hey, those are pre-MSIP Eagles :D

1 Like

2 Likes



F-15C from 104 FW, photographed this month

2 Likes

There is no reason to provide any more sources. Gaijob won’t listen to any

It’s an absolutely fantastic photo
Captures an almost aetherial-like atmosphere

2 Likes

They do listen and fix things quickly like the F15A performance when it came out, its just the radar guy

It can’t even lock a target(bomber) at 80km in HPRF LMAO, but until it’s at at 74km(~40 Nautical miles)

@k_stepanovich
Can it at least be able to lock target’s at long range if you are gonna use soviet values, or a good job. The radar is able to enter RAM (MPRF) just under 40 nautical miles and it’s not able to even lock a bomber at 40 N.M in HPRF ingame. Ridiculous

2 Likes

It might be the HPRF bug again. There was one a patch or two ago that would not let you lock anything at mid to long ranges in HPRF.

Does appear to instantly transfer the HPRF lock to MPRF which is why there is a brief Memory track.

No.

The F15 IRL automatically transfers to MPRF from HPRF at around 30 Nautical Miles, which is done ingame and the only part which he read from the manual. IF the sparrow isn’t selected. It doesn’t go to MEM as you can see, straight from HPRF to MPRF at 35 NM.
What happens with HPRF track is that the lock has never been stable as you can see, it never gives an accurate vector as its just shaking around and only stops once it goes to MPRF

Didn’t notice it, I think you are right.

Spoiler

Shameless plug
Shameless plug 2