Duplicate Vehicles: Why We Add Them

And the Skink is American. Glad we can settle it.

Polish btw.

Stink is Canadian. And had nothing to do with america in its development. You sound stupid

2 Likes

Its mentioned quite a bit around here, Especially in German centric threads, But heres a few examples I was able to quickly look back and find.

And the French had nothing to do with the SK105, glad we agree.

It’s just stupidity then.

Hey!

☝
Catch!

2 Likes

Apart from it sold them 99% of the components

What does the skink have again?? A licence to produce it from years earlier
Some bs about the drive train?

It had nothing to do with american and shouldn’t of been added their.

1 Like

I think the better option is now just every Abrams to Germany because l44 :3

1 Like

Ey, leave some Abrams for us because of M68/L7A1 /s

The US has more to do with the Skink than the French had to do with the SK105.

No they don’t.

1 Like

The L44 was derived from the US 120mm Delta LASH program.

You are stupid

1 Like

Haha figures

May I see the US parts in the real Skink? Because I doubt a domestically made turret with Polsten uses US parts. Oh wait, it doesn’t.

This image, this right here:
image
It’s the beginning and end of the Skink.

This here is a Skink on the Grizzly hull (in the UK before it was tested in service (with guess what, the Canadian & British Army))
image
One of many forms the Skink would have taken.

So you’re claiming the US should have the Skink just because of one of the many hulls it could have been put on. It’s like claiming any of Markman’s vehicles that used a US hull to show it off, as the US didn’t make those; Markman did independently. At that point, claiming the Skink and “claiming the world” is the same thing.

And it’s been repeated multiple times: the US could have a claim to the Skink, with versions it used, but it REJECTED IT WITHOUT TESTING, meaning the US didn’t even want a part of the program, which means if the production line (as the Skink wasn’t a prototype but a production vehicle) it still wouldn’t have used it.

4 Likes

Eeeeeh, SK-105 uses CN 105-57, and its oscillating turrets are based on the AMX-13 turret design.

Unlike Skink, which the USA has ZERO Connection with.

3 Likes

Yes, the hull, engine and transmission. The tracks and speakers were American until the Canadians changed them later.

If you consider the Grizzly to be Canadian because they changed some of the M4, the Packard Merlin is American because it was completely redesigned and used American components.

Trust the licenced production is surely american

1 Like

Congrats on two things: not reading a word I said.

And stating every tank to use a L7 (or any other British gun) is a British tank.

2 Likes