You just need to shut up here. No Kugelblitz survived the war. The Americans never captured one. The only thing left is a turret… In Germany
1 Like
That and spamming CAS
And the SK105 wasn’t French, but got added because of French whining.
Oh yeah, and the French Jumbo gets a prototype T45 APCR that was only used by the US.
The issue with foreign mains is they want different standards for their tree than the US but act like US mains are the ones with double standards.
How many Tiger Is did Japan operate?
None. The order in the case was enough. Plus it was evaluated in Germany by the Japanese
Wow it’s almost like it doesn’t matter
Didn’t say otherwise
So the French can get foreign ammunition they never used and foreign vehicles they have nothing to do with and not from their subtrees but the US tree getting the Skink, which was based off a US tank and used US manufactured components is game breaking?
Yeah, that makes plenty of sense.
1 Like
That’s a balancing decision.
It’s not american. It’s not used by america. The sub tree is in Britain.
It was added due to bitching like what your doing here.
1 Like
Quite literally the double standard im talking about.
So, The Brits co-developed the VFM5, Which was intended to be exported to other countries, So its OK they have it, Even though they didn’t want to use it themselves.
But suddenly the rules are different when its the US?
The only difference here is one managed to get sold to other countries while the other didn’t.
You mean like how the Brits got two M1’s after constantly complaining that the M1 is “their” tank because a former colony bought a few? When they have loads of domestic options that could have been added instead?
And Gaijin said it themselves when it was added, It was to fill a gap, Which is the same argument every other single nation main makes when justifying copy-slopping things that go to them.
I would say it does considering I see quite a lot of German mains being angry the XM800 has DM63,
Which is the only thing keeping it from being totally useless at its current BR.
(Which was added long after other countries got T45 they didn’t have)
1 Like
The Skink getting added to the US was a balancing decision.
Of course you ignore the point I made about the French tree getting the SK105 because it undermines your ability to complain about US mains .
Canada isn’t a sub tree of Britain, At least not now it isn’t, And probably wont be a dedicated one considering they already have 3 sub trees.
Right now their stuff is split between other nations on a case by case basis, Like how Germany got Canadian Leopards.
It’s not. The Americans have ccvl and the Brits have vfm5
The stingray however we have in game is purely Thai it was made specially for them as export and is unrelated to america and their stingray.
It shouldn’t of been added for the USA. Since again it was for Thailand.
Because it’s their main sub trees mbt… Girlie don’t be stupid.
Go name a domestic option that’s from Australia lmao 🤷♀️
Idk what this cope is from I’ve literally seen nothing of this. It’s just a balancing fact 🤷♀️ it DOES NOT MATTER.
It was again due to their bitching.
2 Likes
And yet again you ignore the SK105 getting added to the French tree because of French bitching. It’s almost like you don’t care about vehicles being added to trees they don’t belong to, unless it’s the US.
No because you said something stupid so I just ignored it instead of calling you stupid.
The tank is very french it’s a french turret with a french gun and Autoloader and ammo. 🤷♀️
I personally think it should of been added to Germany but that’s because a Germany swiss Austrian sub tree makes sense 🤷♀️ but the tank is basically french with how much was used
Do I need to reply to your stupid points that don’t make sense.
What’s stupid about pointing out other examples to support the Skink being added to the US tree?
The Grizzly used US made hill plates, US made drive train and a US made gun. It was literally built to supplement M4 production. The Skink was built off the Grizzly.
Because the skink had nothing to do with america. The chassis was licenced by Canada the gun was polish and it was for a Canadian need. It was again added because the Americans did exactly what your doing
Duh muh Sherman must be American and nowhere else
3 Likes
Duh SK105 must be French and nowhere else.
Honestly, US Mains who try to blur the points are frustrating.
The problem with Current Stingray is
not the same case as the Skink one.
It is fine to have Stingray, but Gaijin C&P it lazily and added a direct copy of the Thai version.
Oh, and VFM5 vs CCVL? Yes, Gaijin should’ve modified the modelling to represent a proper prototype of Stingray, instead of
- Lazily C&P the Thai version of Stingray, and strap a ‘national sign on nametag of Thai version instead of US version’ which makes it seem like “Thai Stingray on the Japanese Tech Tree is lazy C&P of American counterpart.”
We can even see some US Main complains ‘why Japanese got C&P of our tank’ when Stingray couldn’t be exist if Thai didn’t decided to buy.
In Stingray, they can have it because they developed it, just they should’ve change 3d model.
And Skink,
I explained earlier, unlike Stingray, Skink has ZERO relationship with USA when being developed. ffs.
The two cases are totally different.
Then what.
If Skink needed to be added because of nothing but it uses a Grizzly I chassis,
Then, with the same theory, every Canadian LAV should be added on both German and American tech because…
US Army operates Strykers, which use the same hull,
and MOWAG was a Swiss company, and Switzerland is a sub-tree of Germany??
3 Likes
And it is.