You cant seriously believe that the “reasons” you give are true and accaptable when we see the opposite in the game.
Also nice to see that you dont admit that any addition was wrong, just that “you communicated badly” yeah sure. Thats the issue and not the excessive copy paste slop and AI usage that you totally did not know about pinky promise.
Just wanna point out that we already accept this when it comes to sub trees. Hungarian players need to grind Italy, for example.
You’re both arguing about two different forms of supranational sub trees. Which WT already has. So it would be more productive to you both to think about the pros and cons of different supranational models than making this about first principles of national identity in TTs.
LLM ass comment right here
I mean if you guys copy vehicle can you at least add some effort and at least mask it?
Taking F-14B camo and ctrl+V it to $80 premium without any adjustments
this thing cost as much as GTA VI lol
it’s all your fault, they gave you the worst food but you still spent load of money on it. Blame yourself. I personally bought nothing from them since i saw they buffed russian patch after patch haha
We technically got GTA6 before SEPv3 and F14D (in WT)
You know you can inspect vehicles right?
then poor people had been scammed by this aircraft
And how do you intend to fight a war without one exactly?
You can’t arbitrarily dismiss half of what makes a war fighting vehicle capable of fighting said wars just because it’s inconvenient for your argumentation. Try going to go in a conventional war equipped only with vehicles with M113 level of armament, see how that works out for ya.
Bro is giving target for secret documentalist
Hey, saving 5-10 minutes of your life on writing that is 5-10 more minutes doomscrolling on TikTok.
Why would Gaijin put in effort when they clearly see enough people eating up copy pasting and being lazy. Its the sad reality that we wont see a meaningful improvement to this situationa as there is 0 incentive for Gaijin to do so.
It’s true that the French have a real need for F-16s, and no other French aircraft exist. Similarly, we really need Leopard 2A5s, and not OFLF2s on our Leclerc tanks. Likewise, it’s true that the Chinese urgently need Mirage 2000s, Abrams, and F-16s.
I could go on like this for hours. We want a balanced game and coherent nations, not the same 10 copy-pasted nations. For example, the French don’t want vehicles from other countries, but our own vehicles with stats closer to reality, instead of thoughtless nerfs. For instance, the Super Étendard is rated 11.0 as a tank when it clearly deserves 10.0.
In short, listen to the community instead of trashing it. Your game wouldn’t exist without us!
Again just the selling of a turret what means nothing plus this vehicle was used in swiss trials as something that could be a service tank
That one is basically all Belgian there lmao and they made it one of the worst piranhas
For Britian. For the UAE or something around there
Not even swiss. That’s a LAV so american Belgian not swiss
And you’ve missed the point. Selling a turret has never made a vehicle a joint developed tank again check boxer mgs or anything else with the 3105. Turrets are sold and exported currently
Although I’m extremely critical of developers, in this case I’m going to defend them a little. Nobody forces people to spend €80 on a vehicle, and even if it’s extremely expensive for what it is, you can simply not buy it or wait for sales. I haven’t spent more than €35 on a premium tank for at least 10 years, and I haven’t spent more than €10 a year on the game for over 4 years. Since nobody forces me to spend money, I don’t, because in my opinion, this game no longer deserves more than €10 a year. But if people want to spend €80 on a vehicle, it’s because they want to, and if the developers set that price, it’s because there are people who buy them. As long as there’s demand for premium vehicles, even if they’re expensive, the developers will supply them in the form of increasingly expensive premium vehicles. If you want them cheaper, you know what to do: if there’s no demand, the price will plummet.
I don’t think you understood what I meant. I was actually agreeing with you that a country shouldn’t receive a different country’s vehicle just because it uses a turret designed by that country. That’s why I brought up Belgium’s Cockerill turrets have been installed on countless vehicles from all over the world including the swiss. does that mean belgium should have those nations? no that was my point
also the last vehicle on the list was indeed wrong i accidently used a completely different picture.
If it’s a LAV, it more likely to be Canadian then American. Being the one the family is domestic to after it grew away from its Piranha roots. Plus the hulls are all built in Ontario.
I didn’t get to see the original for long but looked to be LAV-700 model which is an export focused line who is partly related it the LAV-6.0(as both improvements over the LAV-III share stuff), with what little I could find about it. Nearly every example of that line uses a Belgian turret and the few service ones seem to be with Saudi Arabia.
That’s not to say the US doesn’t have any connections to LAVs with a Belgian turret, as they tested a few and under what rules we have gives the US priority claim.
