Fighting russian tanks without the black voids of Kontact 5 and Relikt on the sides would actually be enjoyable. Don’t tempt me.
to my knowledge, there is still 1 large upgrade between the F-15E and the EX, as well as a more recent one giving it the EPAWSS with the first ones rolling out January of 2025
1 Like
Why do you willingly use the senrai pfps 🤣
Anyway cas was not op the buk was very sufficient. Do you think having the best anti air and the best cas by far is fair?
1 Like
You can at least try to lie to our faces better
2 Likes
“It’s a very cool Japanese prototype that we’d love to add to the game, but it is simply so obscure that we likely won’t be able to create it due to the lack of details surrounding it”
But the KH38MT which nobody has ever seen or the Panstir SM-SV where there is a single photo of one being used and the TKB-1055 has only ever been a mockup???
5 Likes
Here are some Belgian/foreign co-developed designs. I can’t wait to see them added to the Benelux subtree, as they have just as much justification for being in the Belgian tree as the Swiss vehicles do in the french, using the same argument.
[details=“Spoiler”]
1
2
3. oh look a belgian/swiss vehicle.
4
5. an swiss sk105 with an belgian turret
6. an belgian swiss design and its actually a service vehicle and not a onoff prototype.
7
8
9
1 Like
Just because it was designed and intended for Anti-Air does not mean it was always used for such.
The M16 got its nickname, the “Meatgrinder,” for a reason: it was against Infantry, despite being designed to fight Airplanes. Many female tanks armed with machine guns of various types were probably not intended to directly engage tanks, as their designs demonstrated, yet they became proficient in such roles.
The Soviet GAZ-AAA (4M) and GAZ-AAA (DShK) are other 2 examples where, despite them being designed for AA duties, they still excelled at providing infantry the capability of mobile suppressive fire. Both can also function in transporting personnel and materials.
1 Like
don’t forget about the M42 Duster, not to mention the lesser known one the M163 whispering death, both of these were used more on ground targets (at least the M163 was) than aircraft
How dare you forget my little gremlin
2 Likes
yea games cooked
2 Likes
You cant seriously believe that the “reasons” you give are true and accaptable when we see the opposite in the game.
Also nice to see that you dont admit that any addition was wrong, just that “you communicated badly” yeah sure. Thats the issue and not the excessive copy paste slop and AI usage that you totally did not know about pinky promise.
2 Likes
Just wanna point out that we already accept this when it comes to sub trees. Hungarian players need to grind Italy, for example.
You’re both arguing about two different forms of supranational sub trees. Which WT already has. So it would be more productive to you both to think about the pros and cons of different supranational models than making this about first principles of national identity in TTs.
LLM ass comment right here
1 Like
I mean if you guys copy vehicle can you at least add some effort and at least mask it?
Taking F-14B camo and ctrl+V it to $80 premium without any adjustments
this thing cost as much as GTA VI lol
15 Likes
it’s all your fault, they gave you the worst food but you still spent load of money on it. Blame yourself. I personally bought nothing from them since i saw they buffed russian patch after patch haha
6 Likes
We technically got GTA6 before SEPv3 and F14D (in WT)
1 Like
You know you can inspect vehicles right?
1 Like
then poor people had been scammed by this aircraft
And how do you intend to fight a war without one exactly?
You can’t arbitrarily dismiss half of what makes a war fighting vehicle capable of fighting said wars just because it’s inconvenient for your argumentation. Try going to go in a conventional war equipped only with vehicles with M113 level of armament, see how that works out for ya.
2 Likes
Bro is giving target for secret documentalist
1 Like