You listen only what you want. I told about bug, nothing was done.
Even about naval feedback. But you still continue to destroy it.
14 Likes
Might I suggest when you add duplicate vehicles in the future, if you have plans for a unique vehicle in the future but it isn’t ready yet, why not make a note of it? It would head off any of this “bad press”.
Like when the M44/M55s were added to a lot of the tech trees, could’ve said “By the way, we do have plans for the Hummel and Wespe, these are just what is ready now.
We are adults, we know unique models take time. Like if you added a Panther to Hungary, but had plans for the 44M Tas in the future, you could point it out. Just a thought.
5 Likes
literally just mentioned the AI problems before :D
I just know it starts with P
2 Likes
Ahh I must of missed it then
1 Like
you do realize those two sentences will never EVER be a thing they’ll do right?
1 Like
I don’t mind an occasional copy paste here and there. But six completely identical tanks is getting a bit ridiculous, no?
11 Likes
These are two different groups of people…
1 Like
Why a future Greek Subtree shouldn’t get any of this vehicles? Greece is the largest Leopard operator in the world, Greece is still one of the last countries using Mirages and has paid billions in F-16, if you have a problem complain to Germany and USA that have sold Leopards and F16 in more than 20 countries,
3 Likes
All duplicate vehicles should be foldered after TT vehicles and not hinder the progression towards unique vehicles
21 Likes
A) So then why didn’t you give us a tech-tree F-14D alongside the Premium one as 90+% of the community requested?
B) Then perhaps we could have official polls about certain decisions and additions?
9 Likes
Clearly it starts with a H has 3 numbers and ends with a M :3
1 Like
Singapore should go to Israel, has no real military relations with Japan
1 Like
So quantity over quality, got it.
1 Like
Gal batash and other magachs essentially copy m60 rise / m60a3 tts gameplay loop. Lws or shell doesnt really change that at those brs.
Dont recall anything close to m51 in terms of gameplay. Maybe french long barrel sherman or m4 t26. But they have better damage output and not just pen value. ± I guess.
We already have answered this.
Quote from thread:
As for the anime-themed Emily tank (Challenger 2), the vehicle design itself was created by artists without the use of generative AI, and there are no Gemini-like logos in the tank’s actual design materials. Some players may see a similarity between the Gemini logo and elements on the black flag mounted at the rear of the turret, but this is simply a design element created by humans. Multiple versions of this flag were explored during development, including variants with several stars and a version with a single star positioned at the end of the white line.
On the other hand, the Gemini watermark that appeared on the vinyl record artwork in materials related to the Emily tank originated during the processing of manually created reference materials by the same outsourcing team. This was not authorized by Gaijin and should not have passed quality control.
We sincerely apologize for the oversights in these cases. We also want to thank the players who noticed these issues and reported them to us. Their attention helped us identify a problem in the production pipeline, and we are taking steps to address it.
If you want to discuss it, we have dedicated thread.
1 Like
Also, stop doing the dumb internal component additions. It does not add fun gameplay. Not everything has to be realistic because this game never has been and never will be a simulator. Internal components take time away from making new designs for no gain. A way to save time and improve gameplay would be to simplify the armour profiles in constrast to making them so complicated. Simpler armour profiles are more fun to play against since the chance of getting volumetric decreases and the design time of new vehicles decreases.
1 Like
If you arent mad enough i remind you of this video.
All your feedback was read, but they chose you are all wrong.
20 Likes
That didn’t stop Gaijin before
IMO most premiums should be carbon copies from the TT so that you don’t HAVE to buy a premium to play a certain vehicle. but I’m sorry, the “we don’t have any alternatives that actually belong to the country” reason… there are SO MANY vehicles that could be added instead of copy paste slop. There should at least be a system in place where you get a bigger and bigger RP/SL discount on vehicles if they’re the exact same one, but in a different tech tree. If I’m researching YET ANOTHER leopard tank for a different country, it should be cheaper than the first time.
4 Likes