A) So then why didn’t you give us a tech-tree F-14D alongside the Premium one as 90+% of the community requested?
B) Then perhaps we could have official polls about certain decisions and additions?
9 Likes
Clearly it starts with a H has 3 numbers and ends with a M :3
1 Like
Singapore should go to Israel, has no real military relations with Japan
1 Like
So quantity over quality, got it.
1 Like
Gal batash and other magachs essentially copy m60 rise / m60a3 tts gameplay loop. Lws or shell doesnt really change that at those brs.
Dont recall anything close to m51 in terms of gameplay. Maybe french long barrel sherman or m4 t26. But they have better damage output and not just pen value. ± I guess.
We already have answered this.
Quote from thread:
As for the anime-themed Emily tank (Challenger 2), the vehicle design itself was created by artists without the use of generative AI, and there are no Gemini-like logos in the tank’s actual design materials. Some players may see a similarity between the Gemini logo and elements on the black flag mounted at the rear of the turret, but this is simply a design element created by humans. Multiple versions of this flag were explored during development, including variants with several stars and a version with a single star positioned at the end of the white line.
On the other hand, the Gemini watermark that appeared on the vinyl record artwork in materials related to the Emily tank originated during the processing of manually created reference materials by the same outsourcing team. This was not authorized by Gaijin and should not have passed quality control.
We sincerely apologize for the oversights in these cases. We also want to thank the players who noticed these issues and reported them to us. Their attention helped us identify a problem in the production pipeline, and we are taking steps to address it.
If you want to discuss it, we have dedicated thread.
1 Like
Also, stop doing the dumb internal component additions. It does not add fun gameplay. Not everything has to be realistic because this game never has been and never will be a simulator. Internal components take time away from making new designs for no gain. A way to save time and improve gameplay would be to simplify the armour profiles in constrast to making them so complicated. Simpler armour profiles are more fun to play against since the chance of getting volumetric decreases and the design time of new vehicles decreases.
1 Like
If you arent mad enough i remind you of this video.
All your feedback was read, but they chose you are all wrong.
17 Likes
That didn’t stop Gaijin before
IMO most premiums should be carbon copies from the TT so that you don’t HAVE to buy a premium to play a certain vehicle. but I’m sorry, the “we don’t have any alternatives that actually belong to the country” reason… there are SO MANY vehicles that could be added instead of copy paste slop. There should at least be a system in place where you get a bigger and bigger RP/SL discount on vehicles if they’re the exact same one, but in a different tech tree. If I’m researching YET ANOTHER leopard tank for a different country, it should be cheaper than the first time.
3 Likes
Like I said, there needs to be a mechansim to add minor nations.
So once you have researched the F-4 Phantom in the USA, you can buy or research or whatever it for greece as well. And then add that minor nation to your NATO lineup in cold-war era battles. Whatever.
So you can fight with France and Greece side-by-side
Y’all are thinking WAY TO MUCH OF THE CURRENT WAY of things.
There needs to be a radical redesign of how countries, battles, and lineups works
4 Likes
So why exactly haven’t we gotten a tech tree f14D and no the f14B is not the tech tree version of the f14D and I’m not the only one who thinks that.
Exactly, if you want a unique premium you should just put a talisman on a tech tree vehicle!
1 Like
we literaly are complaining that our east german vehicles are missing lol,
those still are our domestic tanks that were used as well
Hope is never lost
thats cool and all but it still contradicts the entirety of this blog post, you talk about it taking time to model the vehicles (I know this because I do this myself) but that doesnt excuse the fact AI is being used to cut corners for copy paste vehicles, its literally a problem, not the AI use its self but the mindset of copy paste + cutting corners then expecting players to just jump at the additions like nothing is wrong
12 Likes
Presumably because people will likely demand the unique stuff takes priority and be added now.
The BT-42 was announced to be coming but wasn’t ready for that update. People complained and we got it an update early.
Talismans are never brought up for some reason and it’s incredibly frustrating to see it being ignored.
For these devs?
Yea idk man…
@Stona_WT , so what now if the feedback goes sour on copy paste and push for more unique vehicles what will happen to sub trees in the future ?
1 Like