Look, even so, there are still many examples of faker vehicles than the Kramvagn ingame.
Ships have Different criteria. And 141 was built
Not really.
Dreams Come True has much looser standards.
Although they aren’t in the game currently we have had what are IMO opinion faker vehicles in the game. Think of how long the Ho-ri, R2Y2 kai… Etc were in the game. As a limited special event we may see some things that were only partially completed with “planned” finishing touches/upgrades.
Because there wasn’t a equivalent but I think it should of been removed with tiger 2 105 and panther 2 🤷♀️
None has said otherwise. We just don’t have faker vehicles lmao as of current 🤷♀️
Not to be that guy, but:
Now, does that mean anything? Not really, but it still was approved to be posted on the forums, unlike the EAP and it even got forwarded to the devs.
If you could go back and read what I’ve said many times even above that. It’s been fully denied lmao it’s irrelevant 🤷♀️ it was never armed. Never planed to be armed. Literally nothing and it has a terrible top speed. Passed and anything similar means abosulutly nothing. It’s also a completely team
The EAP was also suggested and passed way before su47 lmao 🤷♀️ doesn’t take much to search for its suggestion
You mean this suggestion?
That’s an April Fools post.
The Su-47 one is a legitimate suggestion that was passed to the devs.
The attempts to make suggestions for the EAP were shut down early on.
Im sure hes capping so the O-I is bigger suprise.
4 Likes
Its not fictional. It was build and tested without main turret. Its basically like maus or E-100
1 Like
Still a suggestion 🤷♀️
What realistically shouldn’t of been as its a impossibly as well
Maus was fully tested and we have photos of it during testing and it was fully functional 🤷♀️ until they blew it up to prevent Soviet capture of a functional model
1 Like
Yeah, just like this one:
The April Fools post for the Su-47 from 2025. The same year that the EAP one was posted.
This suggestion:
Was posted in December 2023 (before the April Fools one) and was forwarded in January 2026 (after the April fools one).
The suggestion was up for 2 years until it was forwarded. You’d think somebody in the Suggestions Moderation team would have deleted it, if it actually was a problem.
Smin has already stated that a suggestion being passed does not give it eligibility for the game. See the quote I referenced earlier in this thread.
Further, I do believe that Smin has vocally hard denied the Su-47 for the same reasons as the EAP.
Correct but this is irrelevant since 1 it’s too high and it’s been hard denied like 10 times now.
Well theres surviving track.
And full report of the testing how it sunk into the ground and damage sustained simmlary to how Maus got sunk in mud in trials in March 15, 1944
Maus trials:
O-i trial report
Just because photos didnt survive/were destroyed doesnt mean it wasnt done.
2 Likes
Means it’s incredibly hard to actually concretely prove it was built and how it would look even with models and blueprints it can be limited 🤷♀️ O-I is likely just a tank we won’t see in game
Well we do know exactly how it would look… and again. Its not like its just design it was tested. Its not like you can model tank from photos anyway. You need blue prints. And those are pretty much complete and avaliable.
Got purchased by finemolds make the model
2 Likes
isnt the OI a forgery like the HO-RI and panther 2 (in its WT/WOT spec)