Some days I just don’t want to play all the nations and only want to play 1 or 2 tanks.
That’s why.
Another person.
The name was created as a joke with a few friends.
Actually, “Fister” is missing a P for “Pfister”, but unfortunately that was lost in the change and spending money on another letter would be nonsense, so it stayed as it is.
It’s very, for lack of a better way to say it right now, number-y. I’d suggest trying to find a way to make it more understandable from a glance for newer players
It takes every BR we currently have and puts one above and one below. This gives space for every “Vehicle that can’t go up because it’s not strong enough, but is too strong at its current BR” to be moved.
Was told to come here to ask. I think I can boil down my whole question to this.
“Can someone that is queing GRB at 10.7 or 11.0, see something that is queing with a 12.3 plane in their lineup”?
and
“Is the amount of 11.3 players that can be in a match with 12.3 planes limited to 4?”
Im trying to find out if its worth bringing higher than 11.7 craft into GRB, if its cratering the MM like I think it is, I’m starting to think not.
There might also be something to be said about using a 12.7 plane in this case to completely exlcude you from 1 death 11.0/11.3 premium users for possibly better matches?
Balance? I don’t think there is the slightest balance in this game, but just as the two sides of the war are not necessarily equal, I think it is acceptable to properly restore the inequality of history, but it is clear that Gaijin, BVVD, has made a mess in this regard, full of BVVD prejudice and arrogance, and we play a game where someone who does not play the game at all determines the weight of a certain vehicle, is this reasonable? This idiot will only look at big data to balance, and this big data will be impossible to match the psychological expectations of BVVD because of all kinds of data, resulting in a complete imbalance in the game. My suggestion is that if the BVVD is going to move the weights of a vehicle, let him play the vehicle for a hundred rounds, rather than randomly adjusting it to an untrustworthy number. It only makes it seem like the bvvd is a fool.
Russia: #3rd best nation in the meta
T-90M and T-80BVM are competitive
Pantsir is the best AAA in game
SU-25SM3 makes excellent cas
China:
Not doing quite as well
VT-4, WZ-10001, ZTZ-99 are all fine, but not great.
TOR is a good AA system
Helis are good for anti air work
Lack high tier support vehicles
Britain:
A bit of a bother innit
Chally 2s are playable but no more
M-113 ADATS is garbage
Tornado/GR-7 are both competent CAS
I will also add that when i made that post i was unaware of the effectiveness of heavy armor and spall liners
Only Rus and Chinese can have working Ammo rest slingshot rocks at the enemy Brits with APDS slingshot flowers .
AP
APCR
APDS
FS
Need serious rework wonder why they broke them 1 year ago and have no fix yet multiple Tickets got sent they know the issues but still Fix cosmetic stuff and missiles radars and so on.
Yeah, the LeClercs… With almost identical shell performance, but a 5s reload. The 2nd best reload possible in the game. With the best possible ammo configuration for said reload.
Are you actually equating the ATGMs on MBTs as… firepower?
Chinese tanks, way less butchered armor…? Do you even know how butchered the 99A and VT-4A1 are?
Because I keep up on all of the reports for the LeClercs and the Chinese tanks. You’re utterly delusional.