Gaijin is blatantly supporting pay to win here
9 Likes
Nah this would be crazy, I was dominating at 3.0 with the AC I during the event and that was before they buffed 2pdr accuracy (along with most other guns at that BR tbf)
That’s fair. I removed it from the list. The armour is also better in some ways to the Matilda, and the Sentinel is far more mobile.
don’t worry, after robbing done, they will also increase its br to 13.0 too. Order of priority for gaijin: Russian bias > money > murica h-te
1 Like
can i just state that italy rank 6 is dog shit the best jet is a f104 that should be in rank 7 and the only solid jet is the g91 but it’s literally just nothing compared to any 9.0 to 9.3 supersonic even a random ussr ally nation would help right now because ariete is not dodging r60 spam
There is no Balance in the game, I think it is actually intentional in order for games to be over as quick as possible and recycle players back into the queues for games. Wait times are the shining obsessive Holy Grail for Gaijin and everything else is a sacrificial pawn to achieve that.
It is just an awful gaming experience and feels like there is nothing that you are in control of and that your efforts are totally in vain and contribute nothing as the outcome is pre-determined. Added to that the huge amount of cheating that is endemic in the game especially in ground it is a worthless spending of time.
It almost feels like all the marketing about how realistic it is and how all this information is used to calculate all these parameters with angles and penetration etc is all just a whitewash and it is just a plain simple RNG program running it all.
2 Likes
Best Italian jets are MiGs 👌
Unfortunately Italian air tree gets a very little attention, at least thankfully there are multinational designs which they’ve added like Tornado or Typhoon, if it was something Italian-only we would still wait for it. Looking forward to Aermacchi MB-326 and MB-339 variants since 2017.
And not only jets, WW2 era is completely abandoned, there are so many props Italy could get, but they all are out of priority it seems.
PS some rebalance of already represented jets would be nice btw, especially with the addition of the thing which could make them unique.
1 Like
How is the BI still 6.7 to this day? Can it not go to 7.3/7.7 already?
3 Likes
Barely sees it in the battle; anyways, people will forget about it one day.
Playing 5.7 I genuinely see one once every 3 matches. It’s a lot more common than it was. Idk if it’s because of the sl gambling melon dropping BI’s, but it’s undeniably unbalanced and should seriously move up already regardless of activity
Stona_wt is quite good at covering topics.
For example, the Yak1b is an aircraft that was upgraded towards the end of 1942. In simulation warfare, it’s tier 3.3, while in the German tree, it’s equivalent to the FW 190 A1 :=)
As a tank, the T90A entered service in 2004. We’re playing against a 1985 Leopard A4.
For example, the 109 K4 is upgraded towards the end of 1944, at tier 5.7. Although it’s the same equivalent at the time, it’s also the monster called the F4U 4B, which entered service during the Korean War.
For example, the French AMX, with its 4-second reload time, is up against the 6.7 Tiger 2. It’s more effective than the Peugeot and Citroen.
So why are these guys playing the German tree always competing against vehicles that were produced much later and have much better performance?
I demand justice. These should be taken into consideration, at least in simulation mode.
I remember when tanks were first added to the game. Back then, there were T-34-85s up against Panzer 4s. Hahaha, what a terrible time.
Just goes to show you how good Leopard 2A4, Bf-109K4, and Tiger 2 are compared to those inferior vehicles.
Remember, the newer something is for the BR it is, the worse it is.
The older something is for the BR it is, the better it is.
Because the game is somewhat too compressed along the whole tree.
Take your Tiger II example. German 6.7 is decent at 6.7 but gets exponentially worse for every .3 uptier and exponentially better for every .3 downtier. It’s just impossible to stay in the same timeframe when capabilities evolve so quickly and differently between 10 different nations
When it was introduced doesn’t matter. For example, the PzH2000 entered service in 1998 and its the same BR as the 1944 (?) IS-6. The Gepard was in service in 1976 and the M48A2GA2 was later (iirc), the IS-7 was made in 1945. What you should be complaining about is decompression, not when it was produced.
I don’t know why that freak called PZ2000 was added. You’re right about that.
Also, Gaijin has done a good job of “balance” by keeping the levels of those Is3, Is6, and Is7 monsters high.
Can you imagine playing with Tiger 2 against these monsters?
1 Like
Historically speaking, the Tiger 2 would’ve seen at least the IS-3, likely the IS-4 and possibly the IS-6
Honestly no, they all are a little over br’d and decompression needs to happen for them to be more viable again.
I’d rather play my T-44-100 than any of those anytime soon, as I have a better shell, better mobility, good armor, and a better reload.
Tiger 2 10.5cm should become 7.3
T29 should become 7.3
T34 should be 7.0
And the T26E5 should be 7.0
Or drop the IS-3 to 7.0, the IS-6 to 7.3 & the IS-4 to 7.3
Puma go away from 1_1 sim lineup
Hellcat go away from 3_1 sim lineup
Make The brenus sit at 8.3
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Well several AA like the Bosvark, Yestervark and PBV 301 would become near useless if they had to fight aircraft around the era of their Inception.
Also Concept 3 fighting M1A1s wouldn’t go well.
(Also while British built, the Strikemaster mk.88 is New Zealand operated, not that it changes performance or anything.)