Dance of Dragon - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

lws is sth, a big thing even

Sure, but besides the point really. It’ll be 9.7 and accomplish nothing in trying to bridge the 9.7-11.7, even though @Smin1080p_WT was saying otherwise less than 24 hours ago. It goes to show that the devs seem to have no plans trying to fix their own mess anytime soon.

2 Likes

All BRs on the dev server are always subject to change. As this vehicle does not have IRST, its BR will be reduced.

Other vehicles are still planned to fill this BR in the future.

2 Likes

Yeah what’s up with the weight, why does it weigh 2 tonnes more despite being identical?

I’d read people saying that the NL has better armor

But it will end up at 9.7.

Such as and (more importantly) when? Here you were talking about how the CV9035NL was the first step in bridging the gap less than 24 hours ago, and now this isn’t happening? Was this all part of the plan?

The devs have a terrible track record. Look at the Vextra 105. What gap were the devs trying to fill there when they initially added it at 8.7? And when it turned out it could easily go to 10.0, even 10.3 - the devs decided against it? Would that have not been a good first step?

Oh, and when do the devs “plan” to give France a DF-105 equivalent as promised? We’re coming up on 3 years now…

2 Likes

Yes, for an add-on package which will ultimately be ineffectual.

That would be pretty cool

1 Like

I want those two as well

1 Like

Yes please. And the best thing is that there are so many choices. And most of them have armaments for ASW but also conventional bombs , rockets etc
images (56)
S-2A_VS-29_CVS-33

7 Likes

Yes, as I said above, its IRST was removed. So it will be lowered in BR to 9.7.

As a vehicle entirely without a line-up by itself as a light tank, that would not be a great idea. If the CV90 was going to remain at 10.0, then it may have come under reconsideration.

Again, we have plans in future major updates to expand on these BRs. As you would know, we don’t announce what’s coming in those updates ahead of time. Particularly when the current major update hasnt even released yet.

1 Like

Eh it’s more of a sidegrade.

Does gaijin plan to add a rank 3 light tank to germany in the future? There is a giant gab between the puma at 3.7 and m41 now at 6.7. Would be nice if this could be closed

1 Like

If some are possible, they can be taken into consideration. But we don’t have anything to announce at the moment.

1 Like

yes a east german pt-76b would be possible and easy to do, but still nothing after 2.5 years I created a topic on the old and new forum

Is there a way I can make it more clear for the need of a light tank? I got support on the topics but if developers dont see it I dont know what to do.

2 Likes

But the devs were about to do it anyway with the CV9035NL, were they not(?):

So was this all part of some ill-conceived plan? Which brings me back to my question: do the devs actually have any plans to fix the gap they created and can we expect to see it resolved next update. Or are the devs going to continue leave France hanging out to dry and won’t address issues for another 10 years.

And when can we expect France to receive the promised DF-105 equivalent? It’s been almost 3 years now?

4 Likes

As it cannot receive IRST, it cannot stay there.

As I have answered you twice before, yes, we have vehicles planned for this gap. As I also mentioned, I cannot at this stage confirm when they will be as we have not even released the current major update.

1 Like

I’m late to the party, but thanks for confirming the near future ship additions, especially as you really don’t have to tell us anything. Looking forward to seeing what they all are! :)

Hopefully the recent split of aircraft BRs between modes can also mean we’ll see Naval move above 7.0.

1 Like

Hey Smin, since China has received the LS-6 glide bomb, can we expect to see similar winged glide bombs for other nations, such as JDAM-ER and SPICE 1000?

1 Like

But the original plan was to put it at 10.0, no?

So now you’re just contradicting yourself?


Yes, and are these plans are going to take 3+ years to come to fruition just like the “planned” DF-105 equivalent? Based on the devs’ current track record, do you project a resolution in 5, maybe 10 years? The way the devs have handled French ground is a travesty which many are tired of - you can’t be surprised that people are becoming impatient.

4 Likes