Except that it didnt. F-14D had all the software needed for AIM-120 to work and all the data was already programmed in databus. There was simply no operational need to equip them with AIM-120 since the aircraft was already being phased out of service at that point.
Personally I fully expect Gaijin to introduce F-14D with VTAS HMD, AIM-120A/B and AIM-9M as future addition.
If there are any new variants then it’s not impossible. But at the moment we don’t plan it for the current ones (at least right now).
Yessss come on !!!
I mean, it can’t be that hard right?
It’s literally, sprint at the enemy, hand them some magic in the form of the SuperTEMP, crank, try not to get shot at in return, play like a rat?
Granted it’s not exactly the meta at (BR it’s at, I forget lol) but it’s not really unusable.
(Gunjob going something insane like 3 K/D with something upwards of 1000 games)
AN/APG-69 Radar, Upgraded RWR and CHAFF/FLARE Dispenser, upgraded VHF/UHF radios, Civil ILS system, INS, …
Why exacly? We have plenty of copy paste vehicles
No, all of that is soviet, maybe the machine gun isnt soviet, but that’s little modification.
People whine about it being a premium (like most captured or hell even all land leased tanks for USSR are premiums) while USSR cant even have their own tech.
A country with tank production and design history like no other, yet people will whine if that becomes a thing in game.
Very cool. I kinda wonder how these older aircraft without MFD would display their INS location. Would they have a simple coordinate ticker showing them where they are?
If I recall right my memory, Swiss Air Force would display a piper in the HUD while in NAV mode.
Here the cockpit of the current Tiger II active in the Swiss Air Force
Cockpit einer Northrop F-5E Tiger II (admin.ch)
If GJ brings anything copy&paste from US, I will be very disappointed
Not loading, got any other way of sharing? Screenshot perhaps?
That version has been an event exclusive and is also a marketplace vehicle.
i dont understand why we can get technology demonstrators for ground, but not air. just do both or neither, its not fair on us air players
Time to go home for today?
To be fair there would still be the appeal in the German version.
It is functionally identical to the KV-1E, but still preferred by players for the German team filtering out most of the high penetration cannons with high penetration and APHE.
Making it into a vehicle in the Finnish line as well would not take away from that any more than the KV-1E already does.
No I mean the model… isnt it legit the same turret model baring the gun and cupola?
Nice pic, can’t really tell from here where the INS is. Maybe below com 2 then? needs to have an input.
Anyways, it certainly won’t have that in WT. Just a general wondering.
I’ve thought about that before, but there definitely is a difference between the TTD+CH3TD and the EAP. These tank demonstrators are actual functional tanks, the EAP meanwhile sadly is just a bit more sophisticated than a wind tunnel model
