it has artificial IRCCM due to its speed, and the 5E gets an actual IRCCM
Can a Techmod use themselves as a source for a bug report ? :P
1 Like
Very interesting indeed,
Well according to the leaks it should be for the UK not the US as some falsely claimed due to their copium.
Yes! This combined with it’s acceleration makes them very potent missiles despite being rear-aspect only
it’s not copium, it’s just trying to make sense of Gaijin. They’ve put Australian vehicles in the US tree in the past that the US produced, so it’s not unreasonable to assume it’d continue. But hey, it didn’t
yeah now 5Es have that accel, and an IRCCM so… spooky
wait …
those are f-111C?
lets go
Here we go again
I’m not a US main, nor do I defend them. I’m simply pointing out that assuming an australian vehicle the US made, would go to the US tree. Is not copium given it has been the precedent.
They flip-flop. There is no set rule for it.
But at its core. US can get F-111C from the US. RAAF F-111C is essentially identical and adding a second identical aircraft as event or SQV would kinda suck. (I doubt it would ever be an aircraft that would come as a premium)
So, give it to Britain. We do have a load of Australian vehicles already.
(hunter F58 up until this update has been prescendance for it going else where)
This horse has already been beaten to death many times over
Let’s wait and see what the dev stream will bring :)
I wouldn’t be against it myself
For that matter i am expecting the new 111 to sit around thay BR with potentially AIM-9M
Well the ADATS is also US made but it’s in the UK, from what Smin said it seems like if the UK is in need of a vehicle and the US doesn’t need it it will go to the UK.
Which really doesn’t look good.
1 Like
Yeah… But one hell of a fight for it though. Considering they wont even consider 11.3 BR for it.
I was guessing 12.3 with Aim-9Bs still /jk
I’m aware, I don’t care that the Aardvark is going to the UK. I’m just saying, calling it copium is incorrect because that’s just how things have been for years as is.
assuming the J-10 prototype is true like the leak list says. That would be a 13.0 with 2-6 PL-8s and probably 4 APSIDEs and a moderately worse FM
Im not familiar with chinese missiles, i just gave a guess off the top of my head sorry
PL-8B from what I’ve gathered seems to be a python with an IRCCM, I’ve heard people say it’s the TY-90s seeker head, but I cannot confirm
It’s a PL-8/Python-3 with IRCCM. It’s faster than the R-73 and has more range, but the R-73 is still cracked at short range.