Already been confirmed that Argentina is not a sub-TT of Germany. So probably no.
And with Gaijin being on a sub nation craze recently, I wouldn’t be surprised if LATAM was added to Israel.
1 Like
I love the Pyerremyrsky (apologies Finnish people for my spelling), one of my favorite props. There are a number of relatively unique finnish props like that, but yeah, they are premiums.
Have we gotten a trailer yet I come back to indecipherable memes about mods but no news
Haha yeah…
But the Black Death does hunger…
(So Israel would be a tad shame as UK and Israel are always teamed together in SB)
Yes.
1 Like
1 Like
Honestly…I bet it’s going to be Turkey.
I’m not saying that’s what want or anything…just thinking on what Gaijin would do.
Ahah let’s goioooo
One of the two, yeah. Then Pakistan or North Korea for China, and SEA for Japan, then Gaijin can finally get to adding a certain Balkan nation that I most certainly have not been advocating for for years.
Again why would i play FINLAND on the actual subtree when i can play germany which has more vehicles that were actually used by finland. I can have the:
Panzer 4J 3.7
Stug 3 4.0
HA 75-2 1.7
BF 109’s 4.3-.6
KV-1B 4.0
T34-76 747 4.3
Also marketplace camos actually being more correct than the gaijin made camos.
And would you look at that, thats a lineup.
Respectfully, you have made your point and set out your opinion. Please stop spamming me and the topic on this.
Not trying to get further off topic but I hope NK and SK are in a joint independent tree.
Pakistan and PRC/ROC is plenty. Maybe some more Bangladesh sprinkled in there too.
2 Likes
Yis.
1 Like
You can see why it frustrates me, and why i care a lot for it. So my only question was why bother gate keeping stuff when again you can see how much it hurts TT’s. Especially one so poorly implemented like finland.
Regardless I’ll stop since you cant answer me.
NK and SK In the same tree would be an interesting mix much like east and west Germany but without the gaps lol
To answer and conclude. There are only 2 vehicles we have indicated we don’t have any plans to implement and explained the reasons for why that is. There are other Finnish vehicles possible to implement and other Finish vehicles we have within our plans to implement.
Is there any way for us to let Gaijin know about our dissatisfaction about things like that?
Yeah its just a shadow of what it could have been.
I tryed using it and i came close to get the Aim 120 modification but i just stopped because i couldnt take it anymore.
Sim i did not bothered because of the HUD.
They could have at least gave it the Tornado F3 HUD until its own is finished.
Also that it shares the same BR as the AV8B+ is just criminal since they do everything beder the Shar can do.
12.7 should be no problem since its just so bad rn that it wouldnt be op, only carried by its missiles.
Its more than possible to leave constrictive criticism and feedback in the update feedback topics. Spamming a topic or any one individual isn’t going to achieve that.