I was more thinking of:
Ik heb een BOOT! Ik heb een helemooie splinternieuwe BOOT!
Dutch stuff:
I mean, I use this song even when using British coastal at 2.3…
1 Like
Which doesn’t make any real sense for anything other than forced exclusivity. It is an extremely old vehicle now, with there being countless other newer event vehicles that naturally create exclusivity enough, on top of it being one of Finland’s key vehicles from the Continuation War.
2 Likes
singular addition… just like the F58 was a singular addition :wink:
2 Likes
You did tell me we wouldnt get the Ha 75-2 additionally the problem with the KV-1B being locked is that actually fits on a lineup. The nordic tree actually has a 4.0 lineup the KV-1A probably not. Maybe if the Stu-40, T34-75, t34 76 747 were added then it would have a lineup. Again it feels like you dont care about lineups at all with this or adding 1 of the more important vehicles from finnish service during the Continuation war.
Literally one of the biggest pieces next to the sturmi. The finnish brothers (both KV-1’s) were instrumental to the finnish during that time.
Spoiler
KV-1B before it was captured by the fins. Clearly this with a single camo cant be added.
Or the KV-1 with the early turret because the fins had to blow it up since they couldn’t fully fix the vehicle.
@x_Shini I suppose this means that Germany can officially keep the Hunter F58.
Though I do really hope Britain actually gets a decent Hunter at somepoint (or some major TLC for our existing Hunters)
2 Likes
You said Finnish vehicles to fix a particular gap, the H-75 doesn’t fill or fix that gap.
Once again, we haven’t ruled out any of these additions.
I’m really looking forward to the dev-stream tomorrow
@Smin1080p_WT has your most anticipated vehicle been revealed yet? 👀
British and Finnish BAE Hawks When?
:P
Any UK ground stuff? or is this just more pointless top tier addons that we dont need?
First GPS bomb zamn in game 0_0
Still waiting f/a-18 this winter
1 Like
Again, history wise the KV-1B is pretty important and doesnt make sense to gate keep. Same goes for every event vehicle because imo its an outdated system.
1 Like
British def, finnish probably gonna be prem
Now, now. Some people like top tier stuff, some like low tier stuff, some like both. I hope there’s something cool, what tier it is matters little :)
When/Where else would I complain? We don’t get insights into the actual decisionmaking and the barrier between us and the devs seems impossibly thick.
Complaining here and voting with our money are the only things that are left to do.
This needs more planning when it comes to event vehicles. Developers should really consider more any plans of a potential nation (whether it’s a full tree or sub-tree) versus an event vehicle or we could end up in more situations like this with the Finnish KV, the Israeli Merkava 3D, or any future Czech or Slovak implementation with the famous Slovak T-72M2 Moderna locked out. Same for the Iranian Tomcat.
4 Likes
Im just hoping for a ground decompress over any specific vehicle addition at the moment (though ASRAAM slinger at top tier as a SAM would be lovely)
While ground isn’t good by any means, there are at least Finnish vehicle there, like the ItO 90M and BT-42. There may as well not be a Finnish air sub tree, however.
IDK maybe im crazy but having a vehicle on said nation is pretty exclusive and unique imo. So idk why gaijin doesnt think thats good enough.