Dance of Dragon - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Oh no doubt, im also hoping gaijin will realize the difference in performance to the hull armored tonks of top tier. No reason the 2a6 should be the same br as the 2a7 ect ect.

I have a look

Which makes sense because the A-10 would take longer to get to a higher altitude anyway

2 Likes

True, true

thanks mate, I’m on mobile and don’t have a PC so looking doesn’t show for me

1 Like

Nw and no it’s still on 82 : )

That would require them to spend more than 6 minutes bashing their stacks of cash against a keyboard and hoping it fixes itself.

huh, so maybe no teaser today?

for range, sure. but if you’re just gonna fly over the target anyway and bomb, they’re guided.

I doubt it. Seems like it’ll probably be next week

Yep. M1A1 AIM was the first American MBT with 2nd gen thermals, for example.

1 Like

I wouldn’t say that ; )

But teasers can come as late as 19:00 BST or even later

yeah and tbf it’s still early in the devblog season

Now the real question is what vehicles will be added that aren’t shown off? (2S38 example)

Damn, two days without anything related to the update. Inb4 nothing tomorrow either.

1 Like

Guidance doesn’t mean jack without speed. If you dont have enough speed it can drop short, guided or not

And then reports on vehicles that aren’t played as much or small features don’t get fixed unless you get lucky and a dev sees it.

I have a report about the camera MFD on the F-14B not tracking radar targets unless they are within 2km and once you lose tracking it won’t lock again, but with the LANTIRN pod equipped it will work flawlessly from any distance.

In 4 months no one has seen or put input into the report, granted it’s not a detailed report but it’s got screenshots of the issue and a decent description of it. I don’t have the time to make a Harry Potter sized bug report over an admittedly small issue and back it up with the relevant documentation or images from the US government, but you can find tons of reports in the same way. Meanwhile you have someone (90% of the time on the Russian area) make a report over a vehicle very slightly overperforming and it gets picked up within hours and implemented in a couple of weeks. The whole bug reporting system needs an overhaul, it may have been fit for when there weren’t many players and the game was relatively small but as it stands right now it’s just not enough.

Maybe organising it by vehicle then type of bug like is it a flight model bug/visual model or texture/weapons/misc. Or just something similar but to be honest anything would be an improvement over what is used now. Or how about Gaijin acknowledge one bug for each vehicle in a post like how suggestions are done each month?

1 Like

They work fine from other subsonic platforms, such as the a6? The a10 is slow sure, but if they’re as bad as you say, they likely wouldn’t have been integrated.

Matilda I

1 Like

doesnt stop them from adding all this stuff to the A-10 :D
https://x.com/Fighterman_FFRC/status/1815599817487458665